Warmonger Awarded the Nobel “Peace” Prize, Again

rappler funding

Above: Infographic which identifies part of the funding for Maria Ressa’s “Rappler”. http://www.getrealphlippines.com

18-10-2021: The Nobel Peace Prize arguably lost any semblance of legitimacy when Henry Kissinger, the architect of the US Empire’s war on Vietnam, was awarded it in 1973.[1] Following this travesty, former US President Barack Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009, barely a year into his first term. A week after receiving the award, he sent 30 000 more US troops into Afghanistan,[2] and went on to carry out a coup in Honduras, bomb Libya to smithereens, and wage an unspeakably barbarous 10-year proxy war on Syria.[3] Today, the farce continues with the 2021 Nobel Peace Prize being jointly awarded to Maria Ressa and Dmitry Muratov. Muratov is an editor of Novaya Gazeta, which is critical of the Kremlin in Russia, albeit with dubious motives. Despite this, the Russian government congratulated Muratov for his years of journalistic work.[4] Maria Ressa, on the other hand, is a more open purveyor of Washington’s drive to war against the People’s Republic of China (PRC).

Who is Maria Ressa?

Maria Ressa is painted by the Western corporate media as a heroic, principled opponent of Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte, who in turn is falsely portrayed as an authoritarian dictator who bows to Beijing. Little could be further from the truth. As the New Atlas points out, Maria Ressa is a US citizen who is funded by the US government,[5] who is consistently pushing the interests of the US state department in its efforts to isolate and eventually bring down the PRC, the most populous nation on Earth. This is done under the familiar guise of calls for “democracy” and “human rights” – which in this case is code for the restoration of capitalism in China, and the installation of US satellite states which are antagonistic or hostile to China, in South East Asia. Ressa is a dual Filipino-American citizen and until 2012, she was the bureau chief of the CNN in Jakarta and Manila for almost 20 years.[6]

In 2012, Ressa became the founder and CEO of Rappler, a so-called digital media company which later became the most prominent critic of the Duterte Administration. In reality, Rappler is a tool of the US State Department, which funds its operations. The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) – the public face of the CIA – admits to funding Rappler to the tune of $180 000 just in the year 2020.[7] Indirectly supporting Rappler, and Ressa herself, is the innocuous sounding International Press Institute (IPI). Making a mockery of its slogan of “defending press freedom since 1950”, the IPI is in fact jointly funded and organised by the very forces of Brussels and Washington. The IPI openly lists its sponsors as including the NED, the European Commission, Qatari Royal Family backed Al Jazeera media, and the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE).[8] The OSCE is a mere political arm of NATO – the primary military alliance of US/EU imperialism.

Fomenting war in the Asia-Pacific

Rappler is also funded by Pierre Omidyar, the billionaire founder of Ebay, who plays a similar role to regime change specialist George Soros. The Omidyar Network funds a bevy of news organisations outside the US specifically to run pro-Western information warfare campaigns against governments targeted by Washington. These include the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) and the International Consortium of Investigative Journalism (ICIJ).[9] The ICIJ is currently known for the Pandora Papers, which, not surprisingly, does not name a single corrupt figure from the USA – but plenty from Russia, Latin America and elsewhere. Rappler and its CEO Maria Ressa are not innocent parties carrying out honest investigative journalism – far from it.

While Rappler continuously denounces the Duterte Administration for developing trade and investment ties with China,[10] which cannot but benefit the Philippines, Rappler is the most vociferous in its not so subtle urging of war on China. In fact, under CEO Maria Ressa, Rappler stridently criticises President Duterte for NOT going to war against China. Rappler repeatedly asserts that the Philippines must assert its disputed claims in the South China Sea – which it terms the “West Philippines Sea”.[11] Rappler even couches its demands for war under the guise of blaming Duterte for trying to start a war! To the chagrin of Ressa, President Duterte has repeatedly emphasised that the Philippines does not have the capacity, nor the desire, to go to war with China.[12]  Ms Ressa can claim that she is standing for “human rights” and “democracy” until the cows come home – but in practice she is pressing for what would be a catastrophic US backed war on China in the Asia-Pacific. Some peacenik!

Both the government of the PRC and the Philippines enacted nonsensical and harsh lockdown measures in response to the fraudulent Covid “pandemic”. President Duterte can certainly be criticised for this, even though he stated that he “hates lockdowns”.[13] The conservative bureaucracy of the Communist Party of China, however, imposed scientifically unjustifiable lockdowns and other risible restrictions in order to stabilise and prop up Western imperialism. Workers of the world cannot forgive such a betrayal. Stalinism wrongly assumes that the Western ruling classes can be persuaded to live peacefully alongside a heavily deformed workers’ state such as the PRC. It is prepared to go to any lengths to bring this about – up to and including the imposition of the largest health sham in history.

Despite the active co-operation of Beijing, Washington and the EU will never accept the rule of the working class – however tenuous – over 20% of the world’s population. The PRC’s predominantly state owned and planned economy means it vastly outperforms the West – in science, technology, telecommunications, artificial intelligence and more. Thus, imperialist war against Red China can only be averted if the workers of the West disarm them through socialist revolution. The PRC requires a proletarian political revolution, to initiate workers’ democracy and complete the gains of 1949. Key to this task is the formation of genuine Marxist vanguard parties, East and West, to build internationally integrated planned economies and to permanently end the danger of a devastating Pacific war.

WORKERS  LEAGUE

www.redfireonline.com

E: workersleague@redfireonline.com


[1] https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/1973/kissinger/facts/ (17-10-2021)

[2] https://www.vox.com/2014/10/6/6895363/nobel-prizes-winners-controversies-explained (17-10-2021)

[3] https://journal-neo.org/2016/08/28/syria-the-obama-conviction/ (17-10-2021)

[4] https://www.thenationalnews.com/world/europe/2021/10/08/who-is-dmitry-muratov-nobel-winner-and-voice-of-russias-independent-media/ (17-10-2021)

[5] https://newatlas.report/2021/10/11/nobel-peace-prizes-maria-ressa-a-us-citizen-funded-by-the-us-government/ (17-10-2021)

[6] https://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/former-cnn-southeast-asia-bureau-chief-maria-ressa-wins-nobel-peace-prize/491304/ (17-10-2021)

[7] https://www.ned.org/region/asia/philippines-2020/ (17-10-2021)

[8] https://ipi.media/journalism-takes-centre-stage-in-vienna-at-the-2021-ipi-world-congress/ (17-10-2021)

[9] https://politics.com.ph/exposed-find-out-how-rappler-financier-pierre-omidyar-uses-media-to-advance-western-agenda (17-10-2021)

[10] https://www.rappler.com/business/charts-how-duterte-love-affair-china-shaped-philippine-economy (17-10-2021)

[11] https://www.rappler.com/nation/duterte-repeats-threat-war-china-refuses-assert-west-philippine-sea-right (17-10-2021)

[12] https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1464844/go-to-war-with-china-over-west-ph-sea-it-will-be-a-massacre-says-dutert (17-10-2021)

[13] https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2020/06/23/2022941/duterte-says-he-hates-lockdown-will-resume-nationwide-visits-military-camps (17-10-2021)

It’s a Shutdown, not a “Pandemic”

corona closure

http://www.hospitalitybusiness.co.nz

10-10-2021: The dictum of “two weeks to flatten the curve” has to go down as one of the biggest whoppers in history, right up there with the lie that Iraq had “weapons of mass destruction” in 2003. We are now approaching two years of political repression – lockdowns, facemask and vaccine mandates, tracking and tracing, border closures etc. – based on increasingly hysterical shrieking about “following the science”. Yet from start to finish, Covid ideology is chock full of postulates that are so absurd that a child could expose its contradictions. Whether or not they have actively protested against such nonsense, the overwhelming majority of working and self-employed people eagerly yearn for an end to draconian state dictates and a return to some semblance of normality in their lives.

Lockdowns were about the economy, not “healthcare”

There never was, and is not now, a “pandemic” of “Covid”. Even a cursory glance at basic statistics will reveal that “Covid” mortality mirrored all-cause mortality, the average age of “Covid death” was above average life expectancy, and hospitals were not at all overwhelmed.[1] So what were lockdowns all about? It is difficult to avoid the conclusion that the ruling elite decided to use a fake pandemic to partially run the economy into the ground with the (vain) hope of restarting or re-boosting private production for private profit. It matters not that millions of workers were hurled into unemployment, nor that millions of small businesses were reduced to bankruptcy. In a capitalist depression, big finance capital still comes out a clear winner – regardless of the destitution wrought upon the rest of society.

Lockdowns created mass despair to the overwhelming majority, yet the billionaires were smiling all the way to the banks they probably own. In the USA during March 18 and June 4 in 2020, the wealth of America’s billionaires surged by $565 billion – while 42.6 million Americans filed jobless claims.[2] In the United Kingdom (UK), the lockdowns created 24 more billionaires than had previously existed, taking the total to 171 – the highest ever.[3] In Australia, the nation’s seven richest billionaires increased their net wealth by 69.3 billion dollars (AUD) during the lockdowns.[4] How did this happen? Mostly through shares, commodity prices and other assets, which soared in value. The stock markets in the West are set up to do just that, regardless of whether the physical economy is operating.

While billionaires clinked their wine glasses, many workers were thrown into the hell of lost working hours, lost jobs, and relocating to find work. One study showed that workers worldwide lost $37 trillion in earnings, with women and young people taking the largest hits.[5] A study by the International Labor Organisation found that the equivalent of 255 million full time jobs were lost during 2020, which represents a figure four times the amount lost during the “Global Financial Crisis” of 2009.[6] The lockdowns represented the most colossal transfer of wealth from the have-nots to the haves in history. It is beyond laughable to claim that this was an unfortunate by-product of necessary health measures.

Deliberate shutdown

The lockdowns were a deliberate move to partially shutdown as many economies worldwide as was possible. There is no clearer example than the case of Belarus. Its President Alexander Lukashenko stated in an interview that the World bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) had offered him a bribe of $940 million in exchange for “Covid Relief Aid”. The only condition was that, in return, Belarus would: impose extreme lockdowns, force people to wear facemasks, enact strict curfews, impose a police state and crash the economy.[7] To his credit, Lukashenko refused and Belarus never locked down. Not surprisingly, while the Belarusian Football League and the Victory Day Parade was never cancelled, Belarus had one of the lowest rates of “Covid death” in all of Europe.[8]

The lockdown woke left cannot conceive that the ruling class would partially close the economy or self-inflict a depression. They bleat that people lost their jobs and the economy slowed down “because of Covid”. With indignance they exclaim that capitalists seek to make profit by exploiting the working class, and so they would “never” themselves actuate economic conditions where they might lose some of their takings. These simpletons display a token grasp of the ABCs of Marxism. Do they not recall the many occasions throughout history where unscrupulous employers have shutdown production at their industry, and locked out their entire workforce? In order to drive down the wages and conditions of their workforce, industrial employers are often prepared to provoke a strike, or to literally lock the gates of their workplaces so that workers cannot enter. Such employers figure – correctly – that they have more than enough cash reserves to “starve out” the workers.

Working people rely on a weekly, fortnightly or monthly income. Large capitalist employers, on the other hand, have all kinds of cash and assets built up over years and decades of accumulating capital, built off the backs of their workers. They can easily sustain a few months, six months or a year, of no operation. If they eventually re-start while forcing workers to work for less, they figure they will be better off overall. In the same vein, the global capitalist ruling classes appear to have calculated that the losses they sustain through one or two years of lockdown will, in the end, benefit them. After all, now they have a workforce which is terrorised not only about “Covid”, but the prospect of losing income altogether. A workforce which makes no demands, and is ideologically submissive, is their ultimate.

Co-leader of the Russian Revolution L Trotsky remarked that in a severe crisis the nation stops going forward. If at the dawn of capitalism it was the Luddites who destroyed the machines, at the dusk it is the capitalists themselves who destroy their own creations.[9] This above all is the marker which indicates that bourgeois society has reduced itself to folly. In response, socialists should demand and fight for a six-hour workday, to create employment for all who require it. Workers urgently need a Leninist vanguard party, to help counter capitalist absurdity and found a rationally planned economy.

WORKERS  LEAGUE

www.redfireonline.com

E: workersleague@redfireonline.com


[1] https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/22/30-facts-you-need-to-know-your-covid-cribsheet/ (09-10-2021)

[2] https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/06/04/amid-covid-19-and-nationwide-protests-americas-billionaires-got-79-billion-richer/ (09-10-2021)

[3] https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/may/21/number-of-billionaires-in-uk-reached-new-record-during-covid-pandemic (09-10-2021)

[4] https://thenewdaily.com.au/finance/finance-news/2020/12/29/rich-richer-billionaires-pandemic/ (09-10-2021)

[5] https://www.businessinsider.com.au/workers-lost-37-trillion-in-earnings-during-the-pandemic-2021-1 (09-10-2021)

[6] https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/coronavirus/225-million-jobs-were-lost-worldwide-in-2020-thanks-to-the-pandemic-report-finds-1.5281152 (09-10-2021)

[7] https://fort-russ.com/2020/09/belarusian-president-lukashenko-says-imf-offered-a-billion-usd-bribe-to-impose-covid-19-lockdown/ (09-10-2021)

[8] https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3543 (09-10-2021)

[9] https://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1936/whitherfrance/ch01.htm (10-10-2021)

AUKUS: The Anglosphere Prepares for War on China

aukus cartoon

05-10-2021: The war on Covid is fast transforming into a war on China. The Anglospheric formation of AUKUS (Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States of America) is just the latest confirmation of already occurring facts on the ground. No one is buying the line that AUKUS “does not target a particular country”. No one is buying the line that AUKUS is just an alternative deal for Australia to build eight nuclear powered submarines, junking the 90 billion dollar conventional submarine building deal with French company Naval Group.[1] In reality, AUKUS is an alliance for multi-pronged war against the People’s Republic of China (PRC), the worlds most populous nation. The PRC’s largely collectivised and planned economy has already surpassed the USA in terms of Purchasing Power Parity (PPP – the amount of goods that can be obtained for a certain amount of currency),[2] and is well on track to overtake the USA in economic performance overall. The PRC’s rapid expansion contrasts sharply with the decades long economic decline of the Anglo imperialist nations now comprising AUKUS.

France jettisoned

Unable to compete economically, the AUKUS powers are bent on doing everything they can to destroy, or at least degrade, the PRC’s economic rise. Some have wondered openly why the governments of the West don’t just co-operate with China, engage in trade and mutually beneficial cultural, scientific and educational exchange? This might be possible if imperialism – the expansionist policy of privately owned finance capital – did not exist. Others wonder especially why Australia would even risk its ties with the PRC, which is overwhelmingly its largest trading partner. Even with the hostile provocations from the Australian government towards the PRC in recent times, approximately 39% of Australia’s exports are sent to China, while around 27% of all Australian imports were taken in from China.[3] In the case of a US led war with China, all of this could cease, sending Australia’s economy into an even deeper tailspin than that caused by unjustifiable “Covid” lockdowns.

While it is true that a deep economic depression for Australia could be just one result of an AUKUS led war on China, the Australian ruling class calculates that its billionaires would ultimately rake in billions more IF they are able to somehow overthrow the Chinese state and return China to the colonial “100 years of humiliation” it endured prior to its liberation through socialist revolution in 1949. Ever since then, the Western powers have not stopped for a minute with efforts to encircle, contain or break up the Chinese “civilisation state”. The Korean War and the Vietnam War in their time were aimed squarely at the PRC, in the same way that US/UK funded destabilisation in Tibet, Hong Kong and Xinjiang is today. Washington and London hardly blink in sidelining Paris if it means constructing another front against Beijing via ultra-provocative “Freedom of Navigation Operations” in the South China Sea. 90 billion dollars for a French company is chump change compared to what Western imperialism would reap if the PRC – the world’s most powerful deformed workers’ state – is no more.

China eclipsing the West

Just a glance at the economic, scientific and technological achievements of the PRC in recent decades reveals the growing gap between themselves and the West. In fact, advances in the PRC virtually proceed in an inverse proportion to the decline of their counterparts. Already the world leader in the construction and operation of high-speed rail, the PRC is currently in the process of laying Vacuum tubes for their Maglev (magnetic levitation) trains. Once operational, these trains could reach speeds of 1000 klm/hr, and reduce the 2200 kilometre journey from Wuhan to Guangzhou to a mere two hours.[4] While there is some high-speed rail in the UK, both Australia and the USA are yet to construct even one kilometre of high-speed rail.

In the crucial STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) education sector, the PRC’s vast investment in its higher education system is reaping tangible benefits – while there are multiple crises in the University sectors in the AUKUS nations. China overtook the US in the number of STEM PhD graduates produced in 2007, and by 2019 was producing 47% more. By 2025 it is estimated that the PRC will be producing 77 000 STEM PhD graduates per year, compared with an estimated 40 000 per year in the USA.[5] Both Australia[6] and the UK[7] are facing an ongoing STEM skills crisis, with ongoing critical shortfalls in STEM related positions. In both countries some in these fields point to gender related stereotypes as justification, but this is far from the main reason. It is much more to do with the critical underfunding of Universities by Western governments. The capitalist state must guarantee the right of capital to make a profit, so if the private sector demands access to “the education sector”, i.e., privatisation, their respective governments oblige. By contrast, in the PRC profit is not the predominant goal of production, so its government can prioritise state investment in education, which then redounds on the development of its own scientific and technological industries.

Washington is most concerned with falling behind China in the field of quantum computing. The central government in Beijing has already pumped 10 Billion dollars (US) into the PRC’s National Laboratory for Quantum Information Sciences.[8] One result is the announcement by the University of Science and Technology in China (USTC) that its quantum computer had performed a calculation 100 trillion times faster than the worlds most advanced supercomputer, which they claimed surpassed Google’s Sycamore by a factor of 10 billion.[9] Quantum computing is the key to improving the processing speed and power of computers, and China’s state backed Universities are taking on and eclipsing Google, Microsoft and IBM in the West. This is one reason why the AUKUS alliance names artificial intelligence, cyber capabilities and quantum computing as essential areas of co-operation,[10] while the sharing of nuclear-powered submarine technology has garnered most of the headlines.

Covid co-operation

Though Washington, London and Canberra would never let on, the basic reason why the PRC is outperforming the West is because the socialist mode of production is a higher socio-economic formation vis-à-vis capitalism. No one is claiming that the PRC is a classless society, but neither is it one which operates on the sole basis of production for private profit. The PRC is a transitional society half-way between capitalism and socialism, and as long as the state which emerged out of 1949 remains intact, the AUKUS powers will never control it. At the same time, the PRC remains a bureaucratically deformed workers’ state, which is distorted by the multi-class forces which gave it its birth AND the pseudo-Marxist vulgarisations of Stalinism – the theoretical basis of the Communist Party of China (CPC). Notwithstanding the reverence which Maoism historically commands within China, the conservative caste ruling the PRC strictly abides by the twin policies of “socialism in one country” and “peaceful coexistence”. These class collaborationist nostrums result in the CPC doing literally anything to preserve “socialism” within its borders, which means capitalism everywhere else.

Covid co-operation between the PRC and the very imperialist powers that have now formed AUKUS is just one example of the working-class betrayal the CPC commits on a daily basis. Some leftists who view themselves as anti-imperialist fall for the false narrative that “China effectively contained Covid”. In reality, the CPC carried out display lockdowns, invasive testing and some vaccinations in order to help prop up and assist Western imperialism. To preserve “socialism” in their own state, a Stalinist bureaucracy will not hesitate to enact repression against its own workers so as to help capitalism in the West through a period of crisis. Sometimes the bureaucracy of a deformed workers’ state such as the PRC will lean on its own workers to aid imperialism, while at other times the bureaucracy of the PRC will lean on imperialism to aid its own workers. Nonsensical fake pandemic co-operation with the West is a prime example of the former, while military and political self-defence against AUKUS is a notable example of the latter.

If this sounds like a contradiction, its because it certainly is. The conservative leadership of the PRC perform a delicate balancing act between the needs and interests of its own working class, and the never-ending demands of Western imperialism to “open up”, i.e., do away with the very element which guarantees its independence – its workers’ state. All bureaucracies have little or no loyalty to political principles, they are primarily about self-preservation. The CPC bureaucracy is no different. However, to the extent that the CPC leadership protects the socialistic character of its state, workers of the world have an obligation to defend it. This stands especially in the case of an attack by the AUKUS powers. At the same time, the need for a proletarian political revolution in China – the restoration of the rule of elected workers’ councils comprised of all those committed to defending the gains of 1949 – remains critical. To a large extent, this is bound up with a political breakthrough such as a victorious proletarian revolution amongst one or more capitalist bastions in the East and West.

Regional provocations and sabotage

The AUKUS imperialists cannot, of course, land troops on the shores of the Chinese mainland and invade with the hope of overthrowing the state. The PRC is nuclear armed, although its stockpile of nuclear warheads is estimated at only 300, compared to the US with around 6000.[11] So AUKUS is simply another web being weaved by imperialism to ramp up isolation type pressure on the PRC in addition to alliances such as the Quad (Australia, India, Japan, US).[12] While an all out war between AUKUS and China may not eventuate, it may not be the goal of the Pentagon. The 2016 report by the Rand Corporation “War with China: Thinking through the Unthinkable” states explicitly that economic ruination of the PRC may be a preferable outcome. As a war on China led by the US would take place in China and not on US soil, Rand estimated that GDP losses in a “limited” war would be in the ballpark of 30-35% for the PRC, and only 5-10% for the US.[13] As the ultimate goal of the total overthrow of the PRC remains out of reach, Washington may settle for sabotage.

Moreover, a “limited” shooting war with China would only augment other forms of hybrid war Wall Street is behind. It is an open secret that the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), funded by the US Congress, in turn funds the Uyghur Human Rights Project (UHRP) and the World Uyghur Congress (WUC).[14] Separatist terrorism in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR) in the North West of China is fostered by the West with the clear intention of derailing important hubs for the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) as well as (they hope) breaking whole chunks away from the PRC. In 2019, imperialism attempted to break Hong Kong away from the PRC, through the direct funding of over 37 000 NGOs from the US and Europe.[15]  Despite this backing, the ultra-violent anti-China “pro-democracy” Blackshirt protests never gained anything like majority support amongst the people of Hong Kong.

To complement the US state backed efforts to destabilise or break away internal parts of China, Washington is simultaneously fomenting political chaos in South East Asian nations bordering the PRC. Throughout 2020 and into 2021, the US government has been behind increasingly violent “pro-democracy” demonstrations in Thailand.[16] The aim is to disrupt or prevent the growing economic, military and political ties the Thai government is, not surprisingly, developing with the PRC. In neighbouring Myanmar, the so-called “pro-democracy” opposition has formed a “National Unity Government” (NUG), with its spokespeople openly calling for money and support from US President Joe Biden![17] At least the government of Cambodia was alert to a similar process taking place within its borders. In October 2017, the Cambodian Supreme Court simply dissolved the “opposition” Cambodian National Rescue Party (CNRP) for treason to the state.[18] The CNRP was being funded by the US government in an attempt to overthrow Cambodia and break its economic ties with China.

Any war on China would be catastrophic and could escalate into a nuclear confrontation. If that eventuates, it may well be the last war, a war which ends humanity. Needless to say, the imperialists who are threatening such devastation need to be removed as far away from the levers of power as is possible. In other words, the imperialist powers – including AUKUS – must be disarmed through a combination of social revolutions in the West, and proletarian political revolutions in China and other deformed workers’ states. The forging of genuine Leninist vanguard parties, linked internationally, is key to preparing the masses for this huge task. A world without war is possible if the labouring majority of humanity can find the path to upend a global capitalism which is careering out of control.

WORKERS  LEAGUE

www.redfireonline.com

E: workersleague@redfireonline.com



[1] https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/australia-france-relations-australia-confirms-withdrawal-from-france-submarine-deal-2542576 (02-10-2021)

[2] https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3085501/china-overtakes-us-no-1-buying-power-still-clings-developing (02-10-2021)

[3] https://www.abs.gov.au/articles/australias-trade-goods-china-2020 (02-10-2021)

[4] https://anti-empire.com/china-to-start-laying-experimental-vacuum-tube-railway-track-for-1000km-h-maglev-trains/ (02-10-2021)

[5] https://asiatimes.com/2021/08/us-falling-further-behind-china-in-stem-phds/ (03-10-2021)

[6] https://earnpadapp.com/2021/09/29/australias-chief-scientist-urges-for-diversity-in-stem-to-help-fill-the-countrys-skills-shortage (03-10-2021)

[7] https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/ready-and-enabled/stem-skills-shortfall (03-10-2021)

[8] https://techwireasia.com/2020/12/is-china-leading-the-quantum-computing-race (03-10-2021)

[9] https://thechief.io/c/news/china-claims-its-quantum-computer-is-100-trillion-times-faster-than-any-supercomputer/ (03-10-2021)

[10] https://www.ussc.edu.au/analysis/explainer-what-is-the-aukus-partnership (03-10-2021)

[11] https://spectator.org/china-nuclear-weapons (03-10-2021)

[12] https://responsiblestatecraft.org/2021/09/17/uk-us-australian-nuclear-sub-deal-is-another-western-attempt-to-isolate-china (03-10-2021)

[13] https://journal-neo.org/2021/09/27/us-war-plans-with-china-taking-shape (03-10-2021)

[14] https://newatlas.report/2021/09/23/de-listed-anti-china-terror-group-rises-from-the-dead (03-10-2021)

[15] https://iacenter.org/2019/08/12/international-action-center-statement-u-s-role-in-hong-kong-protests (03-10-2021)

[16] https://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2021/02/violent-us-backed-hong-kong-style-mobs.html (03-10-2021)

[17] https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2021/08/dr-sasa-myanmar-opposition-joe-biden/ (03-10-2021)

[18] https://www.aseantoday.com/2018/02/the-breakdown-of-cambodias-national-rescue-party/ (03-10-2021)

Abolish Vaccine Mandates! Defend the CFMEU Rank and File (Statement of the Workers League)

cfmeu no vax protest

Above: Construction workers protest outside the CFMEU headquarters in Melbourne against Covid vaccine mandates. Image from http://www.abc.net.au

25-09-2021: After more than 18 months of lockdown hell, rank and file members of the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) in the Australian state of Victoria are waging a pitch battle not only for their jobs, but for their very lives. In the wake of Worldwide Rallies for Freedom against Covid repression which took place on September 18, rank and file CFMEU members gathered outside their Union’s Melbourne headquarters on September 20 demanding their officials reject the oppressive Covid vaccine mandate for the construction industry – “no jab no work”. These workers are right to be furious with their so-called leaders, including Secretary John Setka, who have allied themselves with “Dictator Dan” Andrews Labor Party state government. This entity has arguably imposed the harshest and most severe lockdowns anywhere in the world, which have driven the state economy into the ground, and inflicted limitless psychological harm to its population. This pain has had the most impact on the working class, who have lost countless jobs while effectively being subject to house arrest.

Pandemic fraud

There is not now, and never was, a “pandemic”. The very existence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is disputed, given the fact that no laboratory anywhere has ever obtained an isolated and purified sample. If SARS-CoV-2 does not exist, there cannot be a disease called “Covid-19”. If SARS-CoV-2 does exist, it is likely to be just one of the coronaviruses which cause cold and flu every winter. Therefore, there is no scientific or medical justification for ANY “Covid restrictions”, be they lockdowns, social-distancing, facemasks, state and national border closures, travel restrictions and so on. The PCR test cannot detect a live active virus, nor can it diagnose any human with anything. A positive PCR test does not mean you “have Covid” – given that paw paws, lemons, Coca-Cola and engine oil can also test positive. No one can be a “case” if they have no symptoms and feel 100% healthy. Covid-19 is a mountain of lies so vast it has undermined the very concept of science.

The war on Covid is in reality a form of fascism. The extreme police state repression in Australia and to varying degrees in New Zealand, Europe and the USA can hardly be described otherwise. Fascism is not a separate system contained within itself; it is but a continuation of capitalism when it has reached a stage of extreme crisis. At a certain stage, liberal democracy becomes an impediment to private production for private profit using socialised labour.  All forms of fascism are ultimately aimed at drastically reducing the cost of labour power (wages) to the absolute minimum. The beneficiaries are finance capital, and those who slavishly serve the government – including treacherous Union officials such as the cabal heading the Victorian CFMEU and the ACTU (Australian Council of Trade Unions). These “Unionists” portray themselves as pro-working class, militant, progressive and “left-wing”. This is plainly absurd. Union officials backing any form of lockdown fascism cannot claim to have a left-wing bone in their body. Lockdown fascism has the aim of driving down wages and conditions by hurling millions of workers out of employment and using police state measures to terrorise workers and intimidate the masses into submission under relentless waves of corporate media propaganda.

Workers’ fightback

The Victorian CFMEU rank and file are now bravely fighting back against the fascistic measures of the state government AND their own Union officials. No worker anywhere should have to face the prospect of taking an experimental and highly dangerous vaccine or losing their employment. The Covid “vaccines” are in fact injections with a potentially lethal substance. Vaccination is ordinarily about triggering an immune response in the body to prevent infection and transmission of a particular virus. The Covid “vaccines” do no such thing, as the data from Israel readily attests. What is more, tens of thousands have lost their lives in the days and weeks after taking the “Covid” shot. Anyone can look up the fatalities from the Covid injection – over 500 Australians, and over 13 000 Americans. And only a fraction of these end up being reported, so the real figures are likely to be astronomical.

“No Jab No work” is patently not about protecting anyone from anything. It is yet another tactic the ruling class is using to throw millions of workers onto the unemployment scrap heap. Meanwhile capital itself makes money by cutting its payroll and investing elsewhere OR benefitting from the extreme downward pressure on wages and conditions across the entire workforce. The forcible creation of unemployment creates a mass of workers thrown into desperate circumstances, and Dictator Dan has already indicated that the Victorian economy will only reopen for the vaccinated!  With vaccine mandates spreading across whole industries, workers who lose their jobs to a vaccine mandate may find it more difficult to find work elsewhere. Vaccine mandates and vaccine passports intentionally creates vaccine apartheid.

Workers internationally need to extend all available solidarity to the Victorian CFMEU rank and file. They are arguably fighting the most important industrial battle ever fought. They are fighting for their lives, for the Covid vaccine could very well extinguish that – and for all workers facing vaccine mandates. The right to work is vital, but the right NOT to be injected with a potentially lethal toxin to remain in employment is the most fundamental right of all. ACTU head Sally McManus and CFMEU Secretary John Setka have a material interest in defending a bloodthirsty ruling class clinging to power, in the form of highly paid positions with comfortable retirement plans IF they suppress “their own” Union members. The entire Union bureaucracy must be swept away by a rank and file upsurge, and their place taken by class struggle militants sworn to defend working people against unhinged employers and governments.

The task of replacing perfidious Union officials with genuine defenders of the working class is bound up with the forging of a Marxist vanguard party. While the anti-lockdown movement is heroically waging a protest movement which is somewhat holding the ruling class in check, the absence of an anti-lockdown workers party is leaving many at the mercy of runaway totalitarianism. Such a unit can be built in the process of raising the demand for the abolition of all vaccine mandates so that no worker ever faces the horror “choice” of their livelihood or taking a potentially lethal injection. In addition, workers should demand a six-hour workday, to vastly improve workers’ lives and address widespread unemployment. A better world, free from lockdown and vaccine terror, is on offer if the old world is toppled and replaced by a publicly owned and planned economy where those who labour will rule.

WORKERS  LEAGUE

www.redfireonline.com

E: workersleague@redfireonline.com

Afghanistan: US “Withdrawal” Prepares Hybrid War

taliban flag

Above: The Taliban’s Islamic Emirate flag. It is white and emblazoned with an Islamic scripture known as the Shahada in black lettering. The Shahada is an Islamic Oath and is the first of the Five Pillars of Islam found in the Quran which reads “I bear witness that none deserves worship except God, and I bear witness that Muhammad is the messenger of God”. It is considered a basic statement of Islamic faith. Image from http://www.neerthirai.com

26-09-2021: September 17 saw the US Commander of CENTCOM (Central Command) tell reporters at the Pentagon the August 29 drone strike which killed Afghani aid worker Zamarai Ahmadi and seven of his children – was an error.[1] The “over-the-horizon” (controlled remotely from another region or country) drone attack was allegedly carried out to target ISIS-K, who had claimed responsibility for the August 26 bombing of Kabul airport. This incident supposedly took the lives of 13 US soldiers and over 100 Afghans.[2] Suspiciously, eyewitness reports from the time claim that most of the Afghans that perished were not killed by the supposed suicide bomber, but in fact by US soldiers who started “panic” firing into the crowd directly after the blast.[3] As with so many world events today – especially the openly fraudulent coronavirus “pandemic” – the official narrative of the US “withdrawal” and the Taliban takeover is little more than smoke and mirrors to justify yet another war.

Stage managed chaos

While the US mainstream media was horrified at what appeared to be a chaotic withdrawal of some US troops from Afghanistan (leaving thousands of others, plus 18 000 mercenaries[4]), others have noticed that the sequence of events as it unfolded somewhat benefits the Pentagon and may well have been staged managed to do just that. An Afghanistan which once again descends into civil war after the US military machine “leaves” in fact builds political momentum for continued imperialist involvement in Afghanistan, at least in some form. If ISIS makes an appearance, and as if on cue, claims responsibility for an attack which supposedly took the lives of US troops – this obviously creates political conditions for more military operations against the world’s most notorious terrorists.

While on the surface paradoxical, criticism of the Biden Administration’s mishandling of the “withdrawal” can both praise the “ending” of the forever war AND create the conditions for demands for US imperialism to stay in, or return – to “fight ISIS”. How convenient! Liberals – the political base of the Democrats for both the fake “pandemic” and the effective coup[5] which installed Biden, can thus once again be rolled out to demand yet another regime change war. This time, the target is the very Taliban which they have freshly placed in power. This only appears contradictory if the official narrative of “withdrawal” and “defeat” of US imperialism in Afghanistan is taken at face value. It is plausible to speculate that the choreographed and stage-managed chaos was intended to create conditions of conflict, which, with the insertion of ISIS-K seemingly from out of nowhere – transforms the forever war into a hybrid war of destabilisation. Such a hybrid war – which may very well include conditions for yet another colour revolution – is evidently a win-win situation for the Pentagon and the CIA.[6] Surrounding Russia, China and Iran can then be better targeted by subversive terror sponsored by the West.

Taliban as cartoon villains

If the Western corporate media is to be believed, we are now expected to go along with the notion that the Taliban are the new miscreants that must be deposed. This is literally days after the US state gave over 85 billion dollars’ worth of high-tech military equipment to the Taliban. This included: 2000 armoured vehicles, 45 Blackhawk helicopters, 50 Scout Attack choppers, 29 Super Tocano Ground Attack aircraft and over 75 000 vans and Ford and Toyota pick-up trucks![7]  One wonders if the Toyota pick-up trucks are some of the same ones that the US and British governments basically admitted to supplying[8] to “moderate rebels” – who turned out to be ISIS – in Syria during their appalling proxy regime change war from 2011 onwards. Indeed, not only Toyotas, but ISIS themselves appear to have been transported from Syria directly to Afghanistan, by these same Western governments now claiming that the Taliban are the new bad guys. Lebanese Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah has repeatedly asserted that the US military has been using helicopters to whisk away ISIS fighters on the verge of defeat in Syria directly to Afghanistan, so they can be used as proxy fighters against Russia, China and Iran.[9] So the Libya-Syria rat line has now morphed into the Syria-Afghanistan rat line.

There is little doubt that the Taliban, generally speaking, do not represent political progress. Yet the difference between the 1996-2001 Taliban, and the Taliban of 2021, is in many respects like chalk and cheese. As much as their values might clash with Western political modernity, the Taliban 2.0 are certainly not the backward and violent stone-age misogynists which emerged out of the anti-Soviet Mujahideen (soldiers of God) supplied with CIA weaponry in the 1980s. The implication that they have not changed stirs liberals and the fake left to make yet more disingenuous appeals for Western states to “save” the women and children of Afghanistan. While genuine leftists cannot offer the Taliban political support, nor can they be dragged into yet another hybrid war which is ultimately not about Afghanistan – but Washington’s grand prize enemies in Moscow, Beijing and Tehran.

For example, accurate translations of the Taliban’s first major press conference reveal the Taliban as potentially mild reformers – as far as within the bounds of Sharia Law will allow. The new Taliban stated that women can be educated at all levels and can continue to work. Only the hijab (hair covering) will be required, NOT the burqa (whole body covering). The Islamic Emirate will not threaten anyone (meaning neighbouring countries) and revenge – formerly an essential pillar of the Pashtunwali code – will be abandoned. This has never previously occurred. The Taliban will form an “inclusive” government, with “inclusive” meaning that women and Shiites will not be excluded. Again, this is unprecedented. Freedom of speech, public criticism and debate will be allowed – albeit within the boundaries of “Islamic values”.[10]

In another game changer, the Taliban will ban the production of opium/heroin. So for all practical purposes, the CIA heroin rat line is dead in the water.[11] So the notion that the Taliban (derived from the word for “students”) will immediately prevent women from obtaining an education, will cover women in burqas, will enforce an obscure and medieval version of Sharia Law etc.- is entirely false. While it is true that the 33 member Taliban cabinet does not include any women, it does include one Uzbek and one Tajik in amongst the other Pashtuns. Yet Western liberals would do well to remember that Saudi Arabia and Qatar, joined at the hip to Washington, are headed by entirely male royal families. What’s more, there are indications that the Taliban are angling towards an “Islam with Afghan Characteristics”. One wall in Kabul was recently doused in white and painted with Kufic script which stated: “For an Islamic system with independence, you have to go through tests and stay patient”.[12] Overall, Western liberals who depict today’s Taliban as Disney-esque barbarians sporting long beards and wielding cutlasses are once again acting as foot soldiers for the very Empire they claim to oppose.

Afghanistan and the New Silk Road

What is more, the modern Taliban also displays an ability to recognise geopolitical realities, as well as the economic rise of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and corresponding economic malaise of the US Empire. It is in this sense that the US has arguably “lost” Afghanistan to Eurasia, given the PRC’s stupendous economic rise signified by the New Silk Road, or One Belt One Road (Belt and Road Initiative), and Russia’s rise to military prominence with its superior hardware. Taliban spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid reflected this economic and geopolitical awareness when he stated: “Chinese assistance will form the basis of Afghanistan development. One Belt, One Road will revive the ancient Silk Road. China will be our gateway to international markets”.[13] Such statements doubtless infuriate Washington and their political operatives – hence their motivation for the orchestrating of ISIS style terror AND mushrooming de facto calls for already upending Taliban rule.

Washington is also well aware of the estimated 3 trillion dollars’ worth of rare earth minerals in the soil of Afghanistan, which has never been extracted largely due to being enveloped in war for close to 40 years. Afghanistan’s deposits of lanthanum, lithium, cerium, praseodymium and gadolinium are known to be the largest in the world.[14] East and West are cognisant of the fact that it is only China which has the scientific, economic and engineering capacity to obtain these elements and manufacture them into the vital electronics, microchips and superconductors that underpin the performance of modern economies. In addition, only China, due to predominant public ownership and a planned economy at home, is able to offer the Taliban mutually beneficial terms for the joint utilization and development of these mineral elements which modern technology demands. Ironically, the “stone-age” Taliban – via the scientific advances of Red China – can provide the elements needed for the jet age.

Afghanistan under the new Taliban will also move closer to full membership of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), which was established by China, Russia, Kygyzstan, Tajikistan and Kazakhstan in 2001. It is an economic and security bloc with a stated mission of promoting a multi-polar world, one which denies the USA as the single world power. It has since expanded amongst the nations of Eurasia, and now has a population base of 3 billion people and a combined GDP (Gross Domestic Product) of 8 trillion dollars.[15] Afghanistan currently has observer status, and Iran has recently become a full member, with President Ebrahim Raisi denouncing (US) “hegemony and unilateralism” at the welcome.[16] The inevitable “loss” of Afghanistan to the SCO will likely result in yet more US and UK government attempts to break this cooperation through “ISIS” terror.

Asylum for collaborators?

No sooner had the Taliban miraculously survived the so-called deadliest plague in world history without lockdowns, facemasks or vaccines (!), the lockdown fake left began issuing calls which equate to bellowing for imperialist backed regime change. Unfortunately, this should come as no surprise. It is a very small step from backing calls for “revolution” in Syria where the only “revolutionaries” are ISIS and their off-shoots, to backing calls for “revolution” in Afghanistan where the only “revolutionaries” are ISIS-K. Part and parcel of these demands are the pseudo indignant cries for asylum for tens of thousands of Afghan “refugees”. The Socialist Alliance issued a call for the Australian government to increase its humanitarian intake of refugees by 20 000, and to take in Afghans who had escaped to other countries.[17] Socialist Alternative sung the same tune.[18] The Australian Communist Party joined the fray.[19] The Communist Party of Australia (CPA) ramped up the jingoism to explicitly call for asylum for Afghans who worked with the Australian Defence Forces (ADF)![20]

Would this be the same Australian Army who were exposed as committing some of the worst war crimes in history in Afghanistan? The Brereton Report, conducted by the Inspector General of the ADF, found that Australian troops in Afghanistan had committed at least 39 unlawful killings[21] during their part in the occupation, and this is likely to be just the tip of the iceberg. Afghans who “worked with” the armed detachments of Australian imperialism obviously betrayed their own people in the most disgraceful manner possible. “Translators” enabled the Australian and US militaries to smash down the doors of innocent Afghans looking for Taliban who would be executed if found, assisted the torture of others at Bagram Air Base, and aided tens of thousands of trigger-happy mercenaries to gun down the blameless. These are imperialist collaborators with as much blood on their hands as the Anglo/US militaries themselves. The CPA and the lockdown fake left not only shill for Empire during the Covid class attack, they deepen this betrayal by colluding with the Empire in a military war. Genuine Marxists DO NOT call for asylum or refuge for misanthropic collaborators with imperialism.

The calls for the “non-recognition” of the Taliban government from the liberal left plays the same role. If a nation does not recognise the diplomatic staff of another nation, this is not just a symbolic manoeuvre – it is an act of war. And this is precisely what Wall Street has set up via the Pentagon and the White House: yet another hybrid war for regime change, now with ISIS-K as the “moderate rebels”. In contrast, workers the world over have a vital interest in a temporary military bloc with the non-imperialist powers (Russia, China) and their allies (Iran, Afghanistan) against Anglo/US imperialism. Politically, workers only salvation is forging of workers’ parties which fight for workers’ governments throughout Eurasia and internationally. As far away as it now appears, the expropriation of the major means of production and exchange in the name of society and held in trust by the working class, is key to the breakthrough which is required. Such momentous change can only be led by regionally linked Leninist vanguard parties upholding Trotsky’s theory of Permanent Revolution. Tactically utilising temporary allies, the proletariat is more than capable of blazing a path towards socialism.

WORKERS  LEAGUE
www.redfireonline.com

E: workersleague@redfireonline.com


[1] https://www.commondreams.org/news/2021/09/17/us-urged-end-drone-strikes-after-pentagon-says-killing-10-afghan-civilians-was (19.09.2021)

[2] https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/26/explosion-happened-outside-kabul-airport-pentagon-confirms (19.09.2021)

[3] https://southfront.org/us-forces-killed-afghan-civilians-in-panic-shooting-following-kabul-airport-suicide-attack-video (19.09.2021)

[4] https://anti-empire.com/over-18000-pentagon-contractors-remain-in-afghanistan (19.09.2021)

[5] https://redfireonline.com/2020/10/27/us-elections-left-wing-or-right-wing-coup/ (19.09.2021)

[6] https://countercurrents.org/2021/07/a-hybrid-war-to-replace-afghan-forever-war (19.09.2021)

[7] https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/08/worse-thought-complete-list-armaments-us-leaving-taliban-islamist-groups-enough-fortify-years-secret-warehouse-us-equipment-captured (19.09.2021)

[8] https://newspunch.com/isis-and-toyota-truck-mystery-solved (19.09.2021)

[9] https://asiatimes.com/2021/08/enduring-terror-forever-from-al-qaeda-to-isis-k (19.09.2021)

[10] https://www.sott.net/article/457113-Pepe-Escobar-How-Russia-China-are-stage-managing-the-Taliban (19.09.2021)

[11] https://sputniknews.com/20170825/afghanistan-cia-heroin-ratline-1056794770.html (19.09.2021)

[12] https://asiatimes.com/2021/09/what-to-expect-from-taliban-2-0 (19.09.2021)

[13] https://survivalmagazine.org/news/china-represents-our-passport-towards-the-markets-of-the-whole-world-taliban-recognize-communist-china-as-their-closest-ally (19.09.2021)

[14] https://thecradle.co/Article/Analysis/1912 (19.09.2021)

[15] https://rafand.org/shanghai-cooperation-organisations-approach-to-afghanistan (19.09.2021)

[16] https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/9/17/iran-denounces-unilateralism-as-it-becomes-full-sco-member (19.09.2021)

[17] https://socialist-alliance.org/news/make-afghanistan-war-end-all-imperialist-invasions (19.09.2021)

[18] https://redflag.org.au/article/us-occupation-afghanistan-over-disaster-goes (19.09.2021)

[19] https://www.auscp.org.au/militant-monthly/2021/8/16/afghanistan-a-new-chapter-in-the-tragedy-commences?rq=afghanistan (19.09.2021)

[20] https://cpa.org.au/guardian/issue-1976/20-years-of-occupation-of-afghanistan-crass-imperialism-and-a-humanitarian-disaster (19.09.2021)

[21] https://thediplomat.com/2021/04/australia-avoids-reckoning-with-afghanistan-war-crimes-allegations (19.09.2021)

No Forced Booster Shots!

vax and skull

http://www.personalliberty.com

12-09-2021: The endless corporate media propaganda barrage of “Get Vaccinated!” has persuaded many to line up for Covid shots, whether or not they believe it is the right thing to do. Many figure it will get the government off my back, I will be able to travel, I won’t be excluded from supermarkets, restaurants, sporting and cultural events – I will just “get it over and done with”. With severe lockdown fatigue still plaguing parts of the globe, this sentiment is understandable. Yet if recent actions of the Israeli government are any indication, those who have already been double jabbed with the Covid vax may well have fallen for what may be the largest scam in amongst what is almost certainly the most extensive politico-medical fraud in history. The Israeli state, the most aggressive leader in vaccinating the largest proportion of their population – are now demanding booster shots on top of a Covid double jab, or your Covid passport becomes invalid.

Vaccination or freedom?

The message from the governments of the West until this point has been – you can have your freedom once you are fully vaccinated. We won’t apply any more lockdowns, or facemasks – if you line up for the shots. This was always a barefaced lie, a lie on top of the mountain of lies which underpins Covid hysteria. The Wall Street Journal reported that holders of Israel’s vaccine passports must obtain a third shot of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid vaccine within six months of their second jab – or lose the green pass which allows them more freedom.[1]  The Israeli “Health” Ministry states that a booster shot five months after the second jab will reset the clock and extend the vaccine passport for another six months.[2] In other words, in order to go to bars and restaurants, Israelis will need booster shots to maintain a valid Covid passport.[3] This means that “fully vaccinated” now means something other than having two Covid jabs. They have simply changed the rules. Should we be surprised?

The USA could be heading down the path of an 8-month interval for booster shots, with this timeframe supposedly driven by the “Delta variant”.[4] The Australian government is careering towards a 12-month interval for booster shots, and it has already purchased supplies of both the Pfizer and Moderna Covid vax for this purpose.[5] Once again the “conspiracy theorists” have turned out to be correct. This is not a one-off vaccination program in terms of rolling up your sleeve a couple of times – and everything goes back to normal. Not on your nelly. What may be taking place is the largest swindle Western governments have ever perpetrated against “their own” people. What is being planned is not a one-off vaccination, but rather a permanent vaccination program, and a permanent system of vaccine apartheid. The division of society into two classes – the “good” vaccinated (or permanently vaccinated), and the “bad” unvaccinated. The “clean” vaccinated will be allowed to take part in society, while the “unclean” unvaccinated will be left at the margins to scavenge an existence for themselves. Yet even allowing yourself to be injected once every six months doesn’t really get you into the clear. In reality, the politicians can decide at any time to shift the vaccination goalposts.

Permanent privatisation

The Covid “vaccines” are not vaccines in the sense that they do not confer immunity to anything, let alone a real or imaginary SARS-CoV-2 virus. In addition, even cursory research into the adverse reactions to the Covid injections will reveal some of the highest chances of permanent injury or death from any “vaccine” in history. The very suggestion that lockdowns, facemasks and Covid injections are healthcare measures are laughable. As Big Pharma rakes in billions of dollars from what is likely to be a planned permanent injection program, what is taking place is a form of permanent privatisation on a scale never seen before. This is not just the selling off of whole services and functions states formerly supplied. This is the direct funneling of billions of taxpayer dollars to the largest private corporations on planet Earth, on an ongoing basis. And this is for what is for some a lethal injection!

The Covid War is the actuation of extreme violence perpetrated by the imperialist minority against the overwhelming majority of humankind. All of its attendant ideology is false. Flatten the curve, stop the spread, stay away from others, don’t sing, don’t dance, don’t travel – its all lies. The lies have to be whoppers, and in fact have to surpass the lies which underpinned the rule of the Nazis in Germany in the 1930s (a so-called “master race” etc.), as the prospects for the survival of capitalism is much more in danger than it was almost 100 years ago. If fascism is indeed the merger of private corporations with the state, then lockdown fascism is the clearest example ever provided.

Fascism is the most extreme form of warfare against the working class. In order to save itself, capital is compelled to throw millions of workers out of work, and drastically reduce to a minimum the wages and conditions of those who remain. The sheer political terror of police and armed forces enforcing lockdowns is an essential part of driving down labour’s share of the national income. “Covid” is a convenient excuse. Under other circumstances, there would have been working class resistance to a direct assault on their livelihoods. However, this fightback has been strangulated by Union officials and the utterly fake left who have defended the politicians they glibly claim to oppose. Without the obscene treachery of these “progressives”, the enforcing of lockdown terror would be impossible.

Consequently, the fightback has taken the political path of a movement for “Freedom”. This movement has frequently mobilised millions of people throughout the globe, especially in places where lockdowns have been most harsh – Europe, the USA, Australia. This movement stands between the pre-Covid status quo and a descent into barbarism. Even if the broader masses mistakenly view it as being driven by conservative political forces, the majority desperately want an end to lockdowns, and at the very least sympathise with its aims. Yet this movement must engage the only class which can strike blows against capital – the workers. To that end, we demand a “lockdown levy” – a 10% wage increase for all workers across the board, whether permanent, temporary, contract, etc. A concerted fight for such a demand will also tend to counter the oppression of lockdowns, facemasks and “no jab, no pay”. A better world is possible, and the movement for freedom can be a vital link.

WORKERS  LEAGUE

www.redfireonline.com

E: workersleague@redfireonline.com


[1] https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/02/how-and-why-israel-changed-what-fully-vaccinated-means (11.09.2021)

[2] https://www.gov.il/en/departments/news/29082021-01 (11.09.2021)

[3] https://news.yahoo.com/israels-vaccine-pass-expire-6-102521992.html?guccounter=1 (11.09.2021)

[4] https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/why-eight-months-what-s-behind-timing-covid-booster-shot-n1277013 (11.09.2021)

[5] https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-09-07/covid-booster-shot-when-we-need-them-for-how-long/1004363 (11.09.2021)

Social Credit – East and West

china social credit

http://www.creditinfoweb.com

06-09-2021: The dramatic imposition of lockdown tyranny across much of the Western world since early 2020 by governments plying their liberal credentials has thrown politics upside down. In direct contrast to the 20th century, we now find that it is the “left” which appears to uphold minority rule, governmental authority and the power of the corporate elite – while the “right” defends basic civil and democratic rights and freedom from despotic and arbitrary use of state power. In reality, the “left” drifted to the right over the two decades prior to the “Covid” lockdowns and was unable to reverse course once fascistic terror became a reality – while the “right” more or less stayed put and found themselves taking up the mantle of liberty from capitalist suppression, despite themselves.

“Left” and “Right” against “China”

Regardless of lockdowns mixing left and right like a kitchen blender, there are important exceptions to the rule. There are leftists which oppose lockdowns, in amongst what might appear on the surface to be a “right-wing” anti-lockdown movement. These groups are crucial, for without a working-class fightback against lockdown fascism, a future too horrible to contemplate beckons. Yet it is also vital that left-wing opponents of lockdown regimes have a correct understanding of the class nature of “China” – specifically, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The anti-lockdown movement will scarcely achieve its goals of freedom if it maintains a similar narrative of the PRC as the very forces it is railing against. Similarly, anti-lockdown leftists must make a complete break from the anti-PRC invective both of the majority of the anti-lockdown movement AND imperialism itself.

For example, the Left Lockdown Skeptics (LLS) in the United Kingdom (UK) are breaking important ground by providing a basis for the building of left-wing opposition to lockdown enslavement. However, they sometimes fall into the trap of castigating the PRC in the same manner as their right-wing pro-lockdown opponents – both the lockdown fake left and pro-lockdown state and non-state forces. On the issue of social credit, some who write for LLS make the error of reiterating the essentially false claims that the PRC uses a “social credit” system to monitor every political and non-political move of Chinese workers. Hence, LLS distributes articles which claim that citizens in the West under lockdown dictates now “know what it feels like” to be living in the PRC under “Chinese Communist Party” (in reality, the Communist Party of China or CPC) rule.[1] Another LLS writer complains that onerous vaccine passports could be easily adapted into a CPC style social credit system.[2]

Such plaintive cries display a misunderstanding of the very partial implementation of a social credit system in the PRC, as well as the overlooking of virtually identical systems which have long been in place in the West – albeit often maintained by privately owned corporations. From the off, the very term “social credit” is arguably lost in translation. Social credit, translated as shehui xinyong, carries a different meaning in the Chinese context. Shehui in the PRC does necessarily mean social in terms of individual interpersonal connections. Shehui is also used to refer to “society” or the “public”. Thus a more accurate translation of “social credit” could be “the credit of society/the public”.[3] Indeed, the PRC’s “social credit” system – which is years away from implementation over the entire country – applies not just to individuals but also to companies and government entities.[4] The notion that social credit in the PRC is where the central government checks and monitors every movement and interaction of the 1.4 billion residents of what is effectively the continent of China – is an illusion. The Western corporate media, at the height of the New Cold War against the PRC, obviously has an interest in pumping out wild and fraudulent stories about “repression” in China. Both the anti-lockdown movement and left lockdown opponents make an error if they replicate parts of the New Cold War anti-China propaganda barrage which emanates from the very same forces they seek to counter.

Bogus Black Mirror comparisons

Many critics, from the “left” and right, make allegorical comparisons of the PRC’s social credit system to the Netflix series Black Mirror, which portrays human unease about the ever-increasing use of technology and how it might be used for control.[5] This specious argumentation is well wide of the mark. Only a few dozen towns and cities across the entirety of mainland China have a social credit system, so there is no such thing as a national social credit score. The government does assign social credit codes – not scores – to companies and organisations, for registration and tax purposes. Individuals have a national ID number, for tax purposes. The existing social credit blacklists use these numbers, like almost every other institution in the PRC. What is the difference between this and a tax file number in the West? Moreover, where they exist, the social credit systems DO NOT give a comprehensive ranking or score to each individual, and DO NOT give a score for “good” and “bad” credit. Companies, institutions and individuals are only blacklisted for serious offences such as fraud or pollution.[6] That is, blacklisting only occurs for actions which are serious crimes – the equivalents of which would certainly be viewed as such in any Western nation.

The PRC’s social credit system, which is only in its first stages, is intended to give an overview of the trustworthiness of firms, organisations, governmental bodies and individuals.[7] In its essence it is about whether organisations or individuals comply with legally prescribed social, economic and contractual commitments. It is NOT designed for political monitoring and control – though it is possible it could be used for this down the track. Importantly, there is little evidence that the PRC’s social credit system – in the small minority of locations where it exists – is opposed by Chinese workers. In the PRC, anxiety about pianzi, or swindlers, runs deep. “How do I know you are not a pianzi?” is a question which many Chinese ask if they are called on the phone by a telemarketer, or receive a knock on the front door from a salesperson.[8] In fact, contrary to the knee-jerk (false) alarm over social credit displayed by some in the West, there are strong indications that Chinese workers firmly support the social credit systems – at least for now.[9] Believe it or not, the social credit system in the PRC is generally NOT viewed as a system of surveillance. Rather, in the main, it is seen as a way to promote a more honest and law-abiding society. In a society where fraud and corruption was widespread – possibly due to the expansion of pro-market and “free enterprise” reforms from 1978 onwards – social credit is currently seen as a method to protect consumers and hold firms accountable.

Is social credit linked to social security?

The PRC’s fledgling social credit system must not be confused with its social security system. While the PRC’s social security system is not fully comprehensive, in recent decades it has vastly expanded to cover the overwhelming majority of working people – at a time when the West’s social security systems have been gutted by years of funding cuts, leaving the unemployed and the disabled with bare pittances on which to survive. The PRC’s social security system is totally disconnected from the social credit system, so there is no overlap at all. One cannot be excluded from social security even if they end up on a social credit blacklist. The PRC’s social security system is comprised of six streams,  to which both employers and employees make contributions. These are: Pension insurance, housing fund, medical insurance, maternity insurance, work related injury insurance and unemployment insurance. Maternity insurance and work-related injury insurance is paid into by employers only.

The rate of contribution is variable, depending on the location of the scheme throughout the PRC. Generally employers pay a higher rate of contribution compared to employees, and pay five times as much into medical insurance, and roughly double the amount into both pension and unemployment insurance.[10] While in the 20th century public retirement pensions were won and awarded at a reasonable age, in recent decades the age of eligibility is pushed higher and higher. In some cases, aged pensions do not apply until the age of 70, with a life expectancy of around 79 years! In contrast, working women in the PRC are able to access pension payments from the age of 50 if they work in blue-collar industries, 55 in white-collar industries, while it is age 60 for men.[11] While there are some moves to slowly and gradually increase these ages due to increasing life expectancies, it still tracks in a different direction to the stagnating capitalist economies of Europe, the USA and Australia.

The West’s de facto social credit system

Largely unbeknownst to Western critics of the PRC’s social credit system is the fact that a form of “social credit” has been in existence there for decades – albeit under the aegis of private corporations rather than governments. In the USA, nine out of ten money lending institutions use the FICO Score[12] to make a risk assessment of the credit history of each individual they consider engaging. On the popular market site Ebay, each seller has a rating ranging from a yellow star (how ironic), up 12 levels to a silver shooting star. These stars indicate how honest the seller was, how communicative they were, and how fast they delivered the item.[13] This certainly sounds like a “trustworthiness indicator” – which is one aim of social credit in the PRC. Moreover, there is a prominent US corporation which sells equipment that maintains lists of “objectionable customers” who can then be excluded from bars and restaurants.[14]

Blacklists are by no means the preserve of only partial aspects of the PRC’s social credit system either. The Hollywood blacklist was notorious for denying employment to anyone suspected of having communist or even left-wing sympathies.[15] Top construction firms in the United Kingdom (UK) kept blacklists for years on building workers who were also Trade Union activists.[16] In Australia, tenants of rental properties can easily end up on the tenancy database, which functions as a blacklist for those who miss rental payments[17] – which can directly lead to homelessness. In New York, insurance firms can legally set their premiums based on the social media feeds (!) of applicants.[18]  The monopolistic Airbnb now has six million listings, so a ban from their app may mean people end up sleeping on the streets. What is more, Airbnb can ban anyone at any time, for any reason.[19] Arguably, young people in the US cannot take part in society if they are banned from Facebook, Twitter, Gmail, PayPal, Uber, Amazon and so on.[20]

All of this can be actioned by Western Big Tech, which can claim that it is not part of the government until the cows come home. By default, however, these giant corporations are simply the arms of the capitalist state – and this is becoming more and more apparent to the millions of workers struggling against lockdown tyranny.  Italian fascist leader in the 1920s Benito Mussolini aptly noted that fascism, brought down to its bare bones, is a merging of capitalist corporations with the state. When Big Tech, Big Pharma, Big Retail and others are the most enthusiastic enforces of lockdown and vaccine mandates, they have far eclipsed the role the state had during “liberal democracy” in the 20th Century.

For a permanent end to state surveillance

To be sure, the social credit system in the PRC could potentially be used for political surveillance. Even if so, this will be not that far from what already occurs via private ownership of monopoly corporate megaliths in the West. Working people have the right to be free from state/corporate surveillance at all times. The prerequisite for this is the removal of the system of commodity production for private profit in the West, along with the replacement of the conservative and nationalist bureaucracies which lead deformed workers’ states such as the PRC. That is to say, given the exigencies stemming from the imposition of Covid repression, socialist revolutions in the West and proletarian political revolutions in the East are now critical. Workers in the West need to urgently bring down both the states and governments which inflict lockdowns, while workers in the PRC need to maintain the state which emerged out of 1949 while injecting it with the guidance of genuine Leninism.

The conservative Stalinist caste which rules the PRC can be criticised for many things, but not for social credit – or at least not yet. If they were bona fide Marxists, the PRC’s political rulers would be seeking to march alongside the workers of the world in a pitch battle to supersede class society. The extension of workers’ republics internationally would deliver a death blow to the tottering imperialist regimes, which are devolving into lockdown fascism in order to save their own hides. This is a future which working people can prevent, if they are prepared to collectively defend themselves against Covid repression – by Western politicians or by CPC bureaucrats. Indispensable for locating the path to freedom is the political leadership of a vanguard party upholding Trotsky’s theory of Permanent Revolution. Covidian terror can be vanquished by workers fighting for a new socialist order.

WORKERS  LEAGUE


www.redfireonline.com


E: workersleague@redfireonline.com


[1] https://leftlockdownsceptics.com/2021/08/book-burning-part-2-normalising-the-abnormal (05.09.2021)

[2] https://leftlockdownsceptics.com/2021/08/distilling-meanings-from-the-madness-covid-19-a-trojan-horse-for-the-4th-industrial-revolution (05.09.2021)

[3] MCJ No 2 – 2018.pdf (mappingchina.org) (05.09.2021)

[4] https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3096090/what-chinas-social-credit-system-and-why-it-controversial (05.09.2021)

[5] https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/black_mirror (05.09.2021)

[6] https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/11/16/ (05.09.2021)

[7] https://nhglobalpartners.com/china-social-credit-system-explained (05.09.2021)

[8] https://www.wired.com/story/age-of-social-credit (05.09.2021)

[9] https://merics.org/en/analysis/chinas-social-credit-systems-are-highly-popular (05.09.2021)

[10] https://shieldgeo.com/social-security-contributions-in-china-a-guide-for-overseas-employers (05.09.2021)

[11] http://english.www.gov.cn/state_council/ministries/2016/03/01/content (05.09.2021)

[12] https://www.fico.com/en/products (05.09.2021)

[13] Seller ratings | eBay (05.09.2021)

[14] https://patronscan.com (05.09.2021)

[15] https://www.britannica.com/topic/Hollywood-blacklist (05.09.2021)

[16] https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/feb/27/on-the-blacklist-building-firms-secret-information-on-workers (05.09.2021)

[17] https://www.realestate.com.au/advice/tenancy-databases-blacklisted (05.09.2021)

[18] https://www.wsj.com/articles/new-york-insurers-can-evaluate-your-social-media-useif-they-can-prove-why-its-needed (05.09.2021)

[19] https://futurism.com/america-social-credit-system-china (05.09.2021)

[20] https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/565860-coming-soon-americas-own-social-credit-system (05.09.2021)

Afghanistan: US Empire Shadow Boxing with ISIS-K

ISIS-K

Above: A photo from a video supposedly released by ISIS-K to demonstrate their power. http://www.sofrep.com

01-09-2021: So the corporate media narrative on Afghanistan now runs something like this: 20 years after invading, US forces were kicked out of the country by the Taliban and bungled a hasty withdrawal from the country. Afghans who worked with the US during their occupation scrambled to airports, some of whom were dragged along by a cargo plane as it tried to take off, reminiscent of scenes of the Americans fleeing Saigon in 1975. The Biden Administration is abandoning Americans who worked with the military to their own devices, in the face of the advancing Taliban forces. The US backed Afghan government collapsed without a fight, which allowed the Taliban to re-take much of the country without firing a shot. Some Western governments offer the immediate assistance of accepting tens of thousands of refugees from Afghanistan. From out of nowhere, an ISIS split off (ISIS-K) re-emerges to again target remaining US forces as well as the incoming Taliban.   

A Clayton’s withdrawal

Does this tale bear any resemblance to reality? Fat chance. Like the Empire’s “Covid is the deadliest plague in world history” bunkum, the Afghanistan “withdrawal” so willfully distorts truth only sections of it align with facts on the ground. This was a Clayton’s withdrawal – the withdrawal you have when you are not having a withdrawal. It is a “withdrawal” in the same way in which the US “withdrew” from Iraq and Syria, i.e., leaving enough residual forces to occupy parts of the country to “fight ISIS” – and thereby still largely destabilising entire regions. The US did not “withdraw” and the Taliban did not “win” in the real meaning of those terms.[1] As Kit Knightly points out, the iconic video image of the US Air Force C-17 Globemaster heavy transport plane rolling out of an air strip poses more questions than it answers. Where are the women and children trying to escape? Why are some men jogging alongside and smiling and waving to cameras?[2] Is the US deliberately trying to re-create the scenes of the emergency helicopter evacuation from the US Embassy in Saigon in 1975?

Arguably, the US is not ending the war on Afghanistan, but privatising it. Up to 18 000 mercenaries will remain, alongside thousands of Special Forces operatives, Pentagon contractors and CIA personnel.[3] Moreover, the Biden Administration is only completing a deal signed between the Trump Administration and the Taliban over 12 months ago,[4] but somewhat modifying it to its advantage. Despite Trump’s other politics, one of the central platforms of his run to the presidency in 2016 was to end the forever regime change wars in the Middle East. The Democrats, as perhaps more loyal servants of imperialism, were aghast at the prospect of no more US “interventions”. To retain the veneer of liberalism though, they procured a feigned withdrawal from Afghanistan which was in reality a mere change of tactics in their geopolitical war against Eurasian integration. The US war on Afghanistan from 2001 was never about 9/11 or the Taliban, but more about establishing a beach head from which to harass, pressure and threaten neighbouring Russia, China and Iran.

Taliban 2.0

From fighting “against” the Taliban, the US has switched to working with the Taliban, or at least the new version of the Taliban. The Taliban have repeatedly stated that they have changed and want to live in peace with other Afghans and other nations. While it is true that the Taliban 2.0 [5] are a different force to that which ruled Afghanistan in the late 90s, they appear to still intend to practice a version of Sharia Law, though with some modifications. Politically, they appear willing to cut deals with US imperialism in return for their control over most parts of the country. This may better suit them and the interests of US imperialism, in that the Taliban returns to government – while the US can still use pockets of the country out of reach of the Taliban to launch terrorist attacks against China, Iran and even Pakistan. As the New Atlas reports, the US never had the intention of setting up an independent or stable government in Afghanistan. If such a government was established, it would have little choice but to sign up for desperately needed infrastructure development through the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) provided by the People’s Republic of China (PRC).[6]

The revised Taliban appear to have kept their word that they would not target or kill other Afghani ethnic minorities which they have previously targeted, e.g., Hazaras, Tajiks and Uzbeks. They seem to have given this same assurance to the Islamic Republic of Iran. However, it could be the case that chaos and a new civil war was exactly the intention of the US government in conducting their contrived chaotic draw down. The neighbouring PRC is vastly more powerful than it was 20 years ago when the US invaded. Similarly, the neighbouring Islamic Republic of Iran is also more capable of defending its interests than it was 20 years ago, despite crippling US sanctions. More destabilising violence and civil conflict is always going to benefit Washington, which seeks to derail the BRI and other countries in the region which are partners to the BRI – such as Iran and Pakistan.

Western governments for “refugee rights” ?

Over the last decade, imperialism itself has learnt how to use and manipulate the genuine concern that progressive minded folk feel for refugees and asylum seekers. Refugee rights activists correctly point out that many flee from Third World countries due to the West’s ongoing wars, or simply to seek better economic conditions for themselves and their families. Generally, workers have supported many protest movements calling for humane treatment of those seeking a safer place to live. However, Western governments have no qualms in exploiting real human empathy for those in less fortunate circumstances, if it can be used to further the aims of imperialist war, regime change or just plain terror. As they did in the case of Syria,[7] imperialism aims to enlist liberal refugee rights activists to fuel their destabilisation of Eurasia. As if on cue, Western governments immediately offered to take in tens of thousands of refugees from Afghanistan. The US offered to take 10 000, the United Kingdom (UK) 20 000, Canada 20 000 and Germany 10 000.[8] The Australian government, notorious for its inhumane treatment of refugees, offered to take 3000 [9], albeit with no overall increase in current caps.

It is preposterous to suggest that these governments were genuinely concerned about the welfare of Afghans who may otherwise have faced beatings or execution by the Taliban. This was done to once again mobilise liberal political sentiment behind the Empire, in the similar way in which liberalism was and is being used to impose lockdown fascism in the West under the guise of a “pandemic”.[10] Look how progressive we are, taking in thousands of refugees fleeing the rule of backward armed tribesmen! The pretence is so phoney that only the lockdown fake left could genuinely fall for it – and there were examples. The Socialist Alliance breathlessly urged the Australian Federal Government to increase its Afghan refugee intake,[11] while Solidarity called on the Morrison Government to evacuate the families of Afghan refugees already detained in Australia.[12] As with their betrayal over “Covid” lockdowns, the lockdown left alibies imperialism by issuing plaintive demands for a more humane application of the Empire’s drive to war against the Eurasia and the Middle East.

ISIS-K: the Delta Variant?

As if it was choreographed, there was a terrorist attack on Kabul airport on August 26, which apparently took the lives of 13 Americans.[13] Immediately, a group calling itself ISIS-K claimed responsibility. Supposedly a split-off from ISIS (Islamic State in Iraq and Syria), the “K” stands for Khorasan province, which includes parts of Afghanistan and Pakistan. All of a sudden, reports hit the news that ISIS-K is “more brutal than the Taliban”, views the Taliban as sell-outs for signing deals with the US government, and has aims of establishing an Islamic caliphate across the Middle East and Asia.[14] This narrative would be humourous if it wasn’t so tragic. After being effectively defeated in Syria, it beggars belief that Washington would again try to rekindle the ISIS fairytale in Afghanistan and Pakistan, with an ISIS variant that rings ominously of the fake danger they are pumping out about a “Delta” variant of the putative SARS-CoV-2 virus. Yet as working people have discovered since the onset of lockdown hysteria, truth is very often stranger than fiction.

Throughout a ten-year war of regime change, US and EU imperialism and their allies including Israel, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey effectively armed, trained, funded and equipped “ISIS” in order to overthrow the Syrian Arab Republic. As exposed by famed investigative journalist Seymour Hersh[15] and others, the US government effectively created ISIS and sent it into Syria to collapse the state. ISIS, Al Qaeda and numerous jihadists were given licence to commit the most egregious atrocities against civilians, in arguably the worst proxy war in history. The US Congress itself authorised $500 million of tax-payers money in 2014 to train and arm 5000[16] barbaric yahoos in pursuit of this diabolical act.

History now shows that this elaborate and deadly ruse was brought to an end by a combination of resistance from the governments of Syria, Russia and Iran, assisted by Hezbollah. This was a real defeat of US imperialism, perhaps the first one in war since Vietnam in 1975. Arguably it was this defeat which laid the groundwork for the onset of lockdown fascism in 2020. The US Empire and its allies could no longer tolerate being blocked in its drive for corporate capitalist planetary plunder by sections of the non-imperialist bloc. While the PRC did not play an active military role, the combination of being eclipsed by China’s economic power and Russia’s military power (demonstrated by the superior air power of its SU-35 jet fighters backing the resistance) sent the US Empire into a frenzy. Inflicting Covidian terror on its working class at home was one reflex, and now the deliberate re-lighting of the bonfire of ISIS style “Islamic” terrorism across Eurasia is another.

War on Terror redux

We could be once again subjected to a rehash of the war on terror, which the war on Covid only temporarily kept at bay. In response to the Kabul airport bombings, the Pentagon said the threat of ISIS-K is “very real”, and that it had been sharing intelligence on ISIS-K with the Taliban since August the 14th.[17] The line that ISIS-K believe the Taliban are too “liberal”[18] is spun to imply that the Taliban are now the new “moderate rebels” which makes it fine for the West to now collaborate with them. Give us a break. ISIS-K, may in fact contain US or EU special forces themselves, as British SAS troops were exposed as being disguised as ISIS and fighting with them against the Syrian government in 2015.[19] ISIS is entirely a creation of imperialism, which provides funding, weapons, training and equipment. In the same way in which imperialism fought “against” ISIS in Iraq and Syria, Washington and London will now fight “against” ISIS-K in Afghanistan and Pakistan. It’s mere shadow boxing, but with the same ultimate aim – to bring down Russia, China and Iran at any cost.

So while we will be treated to another round of “here come the terrorists – again”,[20] the terror bogey could be ISIS-K, or it could also be the “domestic terrorists” who suspected some electoral fraud in the US Presidential Election of 2020,[21] or it could be those who suspect another political agenda behind the Covid vaccine rollout,[22] or think something is fishy about being tracked, traced and forbidden from travelling outside their country, state, or neighbourhood. It all just rolls into one really. If the West’s Big Lie Propaganda Machine can convince people that the Delta variant of a doubtful coronavirus is bringing civilisation to its knees, they can be convinced that the ISIS-K variant aims to set up an Islamic state to threaten freedom and democracy worldwide. Its sheer fantasy, but in no way is it any more outlandish than their claims that healthy people breathing out is hazardous to others.

The stakes are high. As the history of the 20th century shows, fascism and war often go hand in hand. Today, a pseudo-medical fascism is well underway, and the nonsensical Covid restrictions imposed on workers worldwide could easily be rolled out to stymie resistance to yet another war against “terrorism” which is funded and armed by the very governments raising the false alarm. Marxists may well be faced with the task of simultaneously building the anti-lockdown movement as well as mobilising workers against yet another imperialist war “against” ISIS, read: against the non-imperialist bloc. The only way to penetrate the fog of war is with clear political leadership of the working class. Given the base betrayal of the lockdown fake left, what is critically urgent is the formation of a vanguard party staunchly defending the central pillars of Leninist-Trotskyism. Linked internationally, such a party would help mobilise workers against war and fascism through the direct establishment of their own organs of state power. The choice would then be clear: capitalism with its lockdowns and wars, or socialism which is determined to wipe fascism and terror from the pages of history.

WORKERS  LEAGUE

www.redfireonline.com

E: workersleague@redfireonline.com



[1] 6 Questions we NEED to ask about Afghanistan – OffGuardian (off-guardian.org) (29.08.2021)

[2] https://twitter.com/kit_knightly/status/1427393502703464449 (29.08.2021)

[3] https://thegrayzone.com/2021/04/16/biden-afghanistan-war-privatizing-contractors/ (29.08.2021)

[4] https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/us-sign-historic-deal-taliban-beginning-end-us/story?id=69287465 (29.08.2021)

[5] https://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/2170159/taliban-2-0-regional-global-impacts  (29.08.2021)

[6] The US Never Intended to Create a Self-Reliant Afghan Government | New Atlas Report (29.08.2021)

[7] https://redfireonline.com/2016/11/16/shut-down-nauru-for-an-anti-empire-refugee-rights-movement/ (29.08.2021)

[8] FAQ: Which Countries Are Opening Doors to Afghan Refugees? And Which Aren’t? (thequint.com)  (29.08.2021)

[9] How many Afghan refugees is Australia taking? Are we going to expand our refugee intake? – ABC News (29.08.2021)

[10] https://redfireonline.com/2021/08/17/lockdowns-and-the-twilight-of-democracy/ (29.08.2021)

[11] Morrison has an obligation to increase Afghan refugee intake | Green Left (29.08.2021)

[12] US humiliated in Afghanistan as Taliban seizes Kabul – Solidarity Online (29.08.2021)

[13] Two explosions at Kabul airport in ‘terrorist attack’; dozens killed – CNA (channelnewsasia.com) (29.08.2021)

[14] What is ISIS-K, the group that claimed responsibility for the Kabul attack? – CBS News (29.08.2021)

[15] (Seymour M. Hersh \267 The Red Line and the Rat Line \267 LRB 6 April 2014) (thelizlibrary.org) (29.08.2021)

[16] Syria Daily, Sept 19: Congress Approves $500 Million to Train & Arm 5,000 Insurgents – EA WorldView (29.08.2021)

[17] Biden Addresses Deadly Terror Attacks At Kabul Airport: ‘We Will Hunt You Down’ | HuffPost (29.08.2021)

[18] ISIS-K: Taliban Victory Giving Rise To A Deadlier Enemy (freedomwire.com) (29.08.2021)

[19] British SAS Special Forces “Dressed Up as ISIS Rebels” Fighting Assad in Syria – Global ResearchGlobal Research – Centre for Research on Globalization (29.08.2021)

[20] Here Come the Terrorists. Again — Strategic Culture (strategic-culture.org) (29.08.2021)

[21] The FBI says the Capitol riot was ‘terrorism.’ Democrats (and Republicans) should, too. (msnbc.com) (29.08.2021)

[22] https://www.sapiens.org/culture/covid-19-vaccine-protestors/ (29.08.2021)

COP26 and the Greenwashing of Imperialism

enviro placard

http://www.bfpg.co.uk

30-08-2021: Ever since the onset of “Covid” lockdowns, the climate crisis has been pushed off the front pages of the corporate press worldwide. The world’s ruling classes saw to it that the “health care” propaganda cover for the replacement of liberal democracy with fascism[1] took and held centre stage for 18 months. Now, with the approaching COP26 (Conference of the Parties, part 26) summit in Glasgow in November, there has been a slight change of emphasis. Climate change and its alter ego global warming are now back on the agenda, or at least according to the corporate spin doctors, but of course “we” still have to fight a “deadly pandemic”. Supposedly, world leaders and global captains of industry will join hands to thrash out solutions to the environmental crisis which threatens the very existence of civilisation. Allegedly, the most concerned of all for the welfare of impoverished humanity from the Third World to under-privileged pockets of the First World are some of the corporate sponsors of COP26 such as Microsoft, Hitachi, and Big Pharma operatives Glaxo Smith Kline and Unilever.(!!)[2]

IPCC Report

Needless to say, the mere suggestion that private capital and their marionette governments are primarily concerned with the welfare of anyone apart from themselves is farcical. COP26, an extension of the United Nations (UN) is yet more greenwashing of the same system of capitalist imperialism which has ground large sections of the world’s workers into the dust through scientifically and medically absurd lockdowns and facemask and vaccine mandates. The very same people, the very same corporations, the very same governments which have removed the most elementary of civil and democratic rights of working people under the guise of “Covid” cannot, by definition, be trusted decision makers on climate. The only figment of scientific reality in the whole COP26 façade is the dire reality of climate collapse which is bearing down on the planet.

As far as working people are concerned, no cross-class international body, such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), can be anything other than a front for the system of the status quo. Any “solutions” such a body presents can only benefit the power elites who commissioned them. Nonetheless, the IPCC latest report only formalises the warnings of climate scientists which in fact began not 30 or 50 years ago, but in 1896. Then, Swedish physicist Svante Arrhenius laboriously calculated the first model of climate change, by demonstrating the process in which what seem like tiny amounts of carbon in the atmosphere can trap heat.[3] The warnings about the danger of the greenhouse effect hit fever pitch in the early 1990s and have intensified since then. The IPCC’s latest report – whatever its faults – is yet another last ditch call for an about turn. Titled Climate Change 2021:The Physical Science Basis,[4] it stresses there is a narrowing window for avoiding climate catastrophe, but only through immediate, deep and sustained reduction of carbon emissions, and even a system of extraction of carbon already in the atmosphere.[5]

Lived reality of ecological disintegration

Doubtless many of the members of the IPCC and the UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change), and much of the environmental movement, actually believe that the world climate can be addressed by the 193 member nation states[6] of the UN simply “working together”. While this remains a fantasy, the lived reality of a climate on its last legs stares us in the face. Heatwaves, droughts, floods, freak storms, wildfires and bushfires are getting worse, fuelled by the ongoing burning off of coal, oil and gas. Temperatures and sea levels are rising, rainfall patterns are changing, and the seasons themselves in some cases are becoming meaningless. In the middle of the North American summer, Colorado is seeing snow.[7] Last December, in the middle of the Australian summer, snow was blanketing parts of Tasmania.[8] Whether you call it climate change, global warming or simply pollution, it is not only altering the climate but eating away at the usual seasonal cycles.

Austria and Italy have just experienced horror floods and mudslides,[9] which are inexplicable within usual weather conditions. In July in Germany and Belgium intense storms saw 15 centimetres of rain poured down within 24 hours which simply washed away houses and cars. Tragically, as of the 20th of July 196 people had perished – 165 in Germany and 31 in Belgium.[10] Warmer temperatures means the air can hold much more moisture. While it is true that not every freak weather event can be attributed to climate change, the frequency, severity and vast extent of them when they do occur certainly can.

The bushfires in Australia during the 2019/2020 summer were unprecedented in scale and ferocity. It is estimated that half a billion animals were burnt to death, pushing many wild species to the brink of extinction.[11]  The thousands of bushfires torched 46 million acres across the continent – an area the size of the country of Syria. 34 people died, 3500 homes and countless other buildings were razed to the ground.[12] The coastal town of Mallacoota in Eastern Victoria witnessed half of its population fleeing to the beach as the bushfires roared closer, ready to jump into the ocean to escape the flames.[13] In scenes which can only be described as apocalyptic, the sky turned blood red, somewhat resembling the planet Mars from the Hollywood sci-fi film Total Recall. In the USA, as of the start of August, 91 wildfires were burning their way across the North-West, particularly Oregon, and even in Hawaii.[14]

Fight Covid and fight Climate Change?

Despite these indicators, many in the anti-lockdown movement make the mistake of drawing a straight line between Covid fraud and climate “fraud”. To some extent this is an understandable error, as the very same “New Normals” who aggressively harangued us into obeying authority on Covid are now the ones sounding the alarm (once again) about the climate.[15] In a sense the liberals who virtue-signalled by brandishing suffocating facemasks and urging the masses to “follow the science” (their ideas about science only) on Covid, are now virtue-signalling about the urgent need to take action on climate. And this just happens to coincide with the lead up to COP26. Of course there is no denying the limitless hypocrisy from this lot, but climate science (like real “Covid” science) is not theirs to vulgarise.

Some astute writers who have expertly exposed the Covid narrative as a cover for a far more sinister agenda mistakenly expand their research and analysis abilities to include climate change as another scarecrow which has no substance. They assume that because some of the same forces that brought us “The Great Reset” and lockdowns and political oppression are also climate grandstanders, this must mean that climate change is another deceit. Yet the aim of the liberal elites speaking for world capitalism on climate is not to “collapse civilisation” or “deindustrialise society”.[16] There is an objective need to achieve net zero carbon emissions – but the liberal elites aim for this in order to preserve the capitalist socio-economic formation. System reformers and their agents believe the achievement of zero carbon will stave off a series of successful workers’ revolutions. That is, they promote “climate action” precisely to prevent a generalised uprising against imperialism.

“Renewable Energy” a false messiah

Though they would scarcely admit it, much of the environmental movement channels the woke billionaires through their advocacy of the illusion of “renewable energy” – by which they primarily mean solar and wind power. The position of attempting to power entire countries – let alone the entire planet – with solar panels and windmills alone is a house of cards. It was thoroughly exposed by Jeff Gibbs and Michael Moore in their documentary Planet of the Humans,[17] where they highlight the sheer scale of physical materials needed for a solar and wind power build out of any necessary size. Coal has to be replaced as a baseload power source – of this there is no argument. Yet it is increasingly unlikely that zero carbon power can even be thought of without the significant use of nuclear energy. Notably, however, scientists who advocate the replacement of coal (and oil and gas) do NOT argue for 100% nuclear, unlike the renewable energy protagonists. Professors Barry Brook and Corey Bradshaw have argued since 2014 that the appropriate mix of zero carbon energy sources need to be used,[18] i.e., not 100% renewable nor 100% nuclear – though they suspect that nuclear will do the heavy lifting.

The renewables versus nuclear debate is a heated one but is made so mainly by the reluctance of generations of environmental activists having to admit they were misled into opposing nuclear power, and who cannot conceive that nuclear energy can indeed be “green”. For one thing, wind and solar has a technical lifespan of 20-25 years, while nuclear energy has a technical lifespan of at least 60-80 years,[19] and probably longer. This means that solar farms and wind turbines need to be torn down and replaced at least three times before one nuclear reactor needs an overhaul. The generation capacity factor – the amount of power that can be produced versus that which is produced – is a hands down win for nuclear. The capacity factor of nuclear power can reach as high as 93%, whereas the absolute maximum capacity for solar is 25% and 35% for wind.[20] Efficient use of land is also a non-starter for renewable energy. Wind farms need 360 times the land space required for nuclear energy, while solar photovoltaic installations need 75 times the land space.[21] Whereas, a standard nuclear reactor can be built on one square mile, or even less in the case of a small modular reactor.

Game-breaking TMSR Reactors

The UN backed COP26 agenda is based on the double delusion of renewable energy “saving the planet” and the trope that capitalism can somehow turn green. In the 3949 pages of the IPCC’s August report there is only one (!) reference to nuclear power – a single sentence questioning whether warmer waters from rivers can be used for cooling reactors.[22] Even if the temperature of the water needed for cooling some reactors was an issue, COP26 appears to be oblivious to the fact that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is about to test the world’s first Thorium Molten Salt Reactor (TMSR), which should be operational by 2030.[23] The development of TMSRs is a game-breaker, as Thorium reactors do not need ANY water for cooling – which is why the PRC is planning to install them in the vast semi-desert landscapes of its Western provinces. Alas, the PRC is headed politically by a conservative bureaucratic caste which has no aim to extend socialism internationally. Hence, it plays along with the COP26 sideshow, in the same way in which it props up the World Health Organisation (WHO) by enacting risible lockdowns, facemask mandates and injections to “fight Covid”.

COP26, as a front for imperialism, will also obviously not seriously address the world’s largest emitter of greenhouse gas emissions – the US military.[24] Nor will it address another grave threat to a safe climate – the drive to World War III launched by NATO and their allies against Russia, China, Iran and the non-imperialist bloc. Greta Thunberg is on board with this war, having criticised Russia for not allowing some climate protests, and claiming that China being a developing country is “no excuse” for not acting to curb emissions.[25] The Swedish youth is also on board with the Western Empire’s Covid assault on working people, stating that she will now consider attending COP26 after hearing that all delegates will be offered a Covid vaccine (!).[26] In keeping with liberal political forces the world over, the backing of intense repression under the name of “Covid” merges seamlessly with NATO-led war.

The fact that the same liberal bourgeois agents enforcing lockdown fascism are now also the leading voices for “saving the planet” emphasises this fact: capitalism’s exploitation of the natural environment and its exploitation of the working class cannot be separated. Any attempt to politically address environmental degradation on its own, abstracted from the division of vast swathes of humanity into the hostile camps of labour and capital, will inevitably reinforce global capitalism. “Climate activism” which lobbies COP26, or which begs the governments of the richest countries to take “climate action” disempowers and disorients working people, as it turns them into mere letter-writing constituents.

While Marxists cannot ignore the dire ecological state of the biosphere, there can be no “climate action” which does not also lead to the desperately needed liberation of the working class. The replacement of liberal democracy with pseudo-medical Nazi-like “Covid” repression adds even more urgency to the task of proletarian revolutions in the West, combined with proletarian political revolutions in the deformed workers’ states, e.g., China. To help lead this giant endeavour, the forging of Leninist vanguard parties linked with international sections is crucial. The climate crisis, and much else besides, can only be seriously addressed when workers hold the levers of power.

WORKERS  LEAGUE

www.redfireonline.com

E: workersleague@redfireonline.com


[1] https://redfireonline.com/2021/08/17/lockdowns-and-the-twilight-of-democracy/ (22-08-2021)

[2] https://ukcop26.org/ (22-08-2021)

[3] https://daily.jstor.org/how-19th-century-scientists-predicted-global-warming/ (22-08-2021)

[4] AR6 Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis — IPCC (22-08-2021)

[5] What does the IPCC’s latest report mean? | Explainer | Climate Council (22-08-2021)

[6] https://www.worlddata.info/alliances/un-united-nations.php (22-08-2021)

[7] It’s August and it’s snowing in Colorado – NewsBreak (22-08-2021)

[8] Summer snow falls in parts of Tasmania (thenewdaily.com.au) (22-08-2021)

[9] Europe – Rain Triggers Deadly Flash Floods and Mudslides in Germany, Austria and Italy – FloodList (22-08-2021)

[10] Europe’s deadly floods leave scientists stunned | Science | AAAS (sciencemag.org) (22-08-2021)

[11] Bushfires push Australia’s rare species to extinction  | Daily Mail Online (22-08-2021)

[12] 2019-2020 Australian Bushfires – Center for Disaster Philanthropy (22-08-2021)

[13] https://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/entry/mallacoota-bushfire-thousands-trapped-on-beach_au (22-08-2021)

[14] https://edition.cnn.com/2021/08/01/us/us-western-wildfires-sunday/index.html (22-08-2021)

[15] The IPCC Report & the Pivot from Covid to Climate – OffGuardian (off-guardian.org) (22-08-2021)

[16] The “Great Zero Carbon” Conspiracy – Global ResearchGlobal Research – Centre for Research on Globalization (22.08.2021)

[17] Planet of the Humans | By Jeff Gibbs, Executive Producer Michael Moore (22-08-2021)

[18] The Society for Conservation Biology (wiley.com) (22-08-2021)

[19] The True Costs of Nuclear vs Renewable Energy – The 4th Generation (22-08-2021)

[20] What is Generation Capacity? | Department of Energy (22-08-2021)

[21] Land Needs for Wind, Solar Dwarf Nuclear Plant’s Footprint (nei.org) (22-08-2021)

[22] https://citizensparty.org.au/media-releases/china-set-test-world-first-molten-salt-nuclear-reactor (23-08-2021)

[23] https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3141581/could-chinas-molten-salt-nuclear-reactor-be-clean-safe-source (23-08-2021)

[24] The U.S. military emits more greenhouse gases than Sweden and Denmark (bigthink.com) (23-08-2021)

[25] https://www.skynews.com.au/world-news/greta-thunberg-and-china-bump-heads-over-emissions (25-08-2021)

[26] https://www.malaymail.com/news/world/2021/08/20/greta-thunberg-drops-boycott-of-cop26-meeting/1999246 (25-08-2021)

Lockdowns and the Twilight of Democracy

markets and police

Above: Riot police in Melbourne pursue anti-lockdown protestors through food markets. http://www.pedestrian.tv

18-08-2021: The Australian states of New South Wales (NSW) and Victoria (VIC) are currently enduring arguably the harshest “Covid” lockdowns ever imposed. A brutal lockdown has kept NSW incarcerated for seven weeks, with no indication of when it will be released. The Australian Capital Territory (ACT) has been reduced to a snap lockdown, allegedly after one (!) positive Covid case was supposedly identified along with Covid positive wastewater (!!).[1] Average temperatures in Darwin, the capital of the Northern Territory (NT) hover around 30 degrees Celsius year round, with humidity fluctuating between 60% and 80% between the wet and dry seasons.[2] The north of Australia, close to the equator, scarcely has weather conducive to the circulation of a flu like virus. Despite this, NT Chief Minister Michael Gunner indicated that the NT may still impose lockdowns and border closures even if the plan of the National Cabinet for 80% vaccination rates are reached.[3]

The remote NSW outback town of Walgett, 230 kilometres east of Bourke, has now also been placed in lockdown. The town only has a population of 2000 but has been sent into lockdown on the putative finding of one (!) positive Covid “case”.[4] Walgett will be joined in lockdowns with seven other Local Government Areas (LGAs) in the West of NSW, including Gilgandra and Brewarrina. Walgett in particular has a high proportion of Aboriginal residents, who make up around 30% of the total.[5] For decades, Aboriginal people in Walgett have endured high poverty rates, with scant health and education services, and a high crime rate linked to a virtual absence of jobs. There is no shortage of money for the farmers though, some of whom have private airstrips, and send their children to expensive private schools in Sydney and Brisbane.[6] It hardly needs to be said that the lockdowns will impact Aboriginal people, and scarcely touch the farmers in their vast properties surrounding the town.

The cruelty of lockdowns is having a devastating effect on the mental health of those subjected to them. Currently, 800 000 scripts for anti-depressant medication are being filled each week throughout Australia.[7] Psychological distress and loneliness[8] is but one measure of the pain being inflicted, as lockdowns restrict or extinguish the very ability to have social interaction. Tens of thousands of jobs are lost, throwing countless workers onto the unemployment scrapheap. Many small and medium sized businesses are driven into bankruptcy, large numbers of which will never open again. The right to travel outside your neighbourhood has been subject to control, or even abolished.

Health emergency illusion

The notion that the planet is being assaulted by the “Delta variant” of a SARS-CoV-2 virus is absurd. For one thing, even the Centres for Disease Control (CDC) and the World Health Organisation (WHO) admit that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has never been isolated and purified in a laboratory anywhere.[9] Secondly, even if SARS-CoV-2 does exist and there is a variant of any sort, all previous immunology says that variants are less harmful than the original. Thirdly, if Delta exists at all, there is no test which can positively identify it.[10] 18 months later, even the basic narrative about a supposedly novel virus which threatens the globe has worn itself to ribbons. There is not now, and never was, a “pandemic”. All cause mortality for the planet has barely changed in the last two decades, including the year 2020.[11] There is no “health emergency”, and at the very least, this has left whole sections of the working class wondering what on Earth politicians are on about.

Even allowing for the possibility of a new coronavirus in circulation, this does not justify ANY extraordinary measures such as lockdowns, facemasks and vaccines. The lockdowns are quite obviously not about health care and are much more to do with political repression and the very real suppression of civil and democratic rights. In Australia currently, the Army is being used to enforce lockdowns in the streets of Sydney. All around the world, parliaments have been suspended, basic laws have been ignored, and the very constitutions of whole nations have been violated at will. Government “tracking and tracing” of entire populations has been introduced without even a cursory debate by local, state or federal politicians. In short, the very notion of democratic rights has more or less been made contingent on whether or not it can be overridden by “Covid”.

For 170 odd years, Marxists have stressed that “democracy” is in fact a form of class rule, and that capitalist “democracy” is only democracy for the rich. There can never be democracy – where the majority opinion or vote holds sway – across different social classes. There can never be a democracy where labour and capital co-exist in the same assemblies and same parliaments, in the same way as there cannot be “democracy” in a workplace between employers and employees. In the transition from capitalism to socialism, there can only be the rule of one class – the bourgeoisie or the proletariat. Thus, there can only be either bourgeois democracy or proletarian democracy. And bourgeois democracy for working people is as much a fraud and a swindle as is the “Covid Pandemic”. Hence, the (now urgent) historical need for the working class to rise to power through a social revolution.

Nevertheless, the pathway to a workers’ revolution can only be found via a thoroughgoing defence of the very rights that were won by the ascendent bourgeois class against feudal absolutism. Workers must defend their bourgeois democratic rights won under capitalism, for without them there cannot be even the first steps towards socialism. The right to free speech, to freedom of assembly, to a free press, the right to form political parties and organisations, the right to form trade Unions – all must be defended as a matter of priority. Ditto for the right to travel, the right to move freely, the right to consent, the right to bodily autonomy and the right to due legal process. The victory of proletarian democracy, via the establishment of a workers’ republic, cannot be obtained if the working class does not vigorously defend every democratic right it obtained during “normal” capitalist operation.

The twilight of liberal democracy

With the excuse of Covid, almost all bourgeois or liberal democratic rights have been curtailed, suspended or simply abolished. Even many of those who, despite everything, still cling to some notion of the government clumsily acting to protect people from a pathogen, are aghast at the blasé bypassing of the elementary norms of parliamentary due process. Even if they somehow uphold the notion of a “health emergency”, they sense something foreboding about the effective cancellation of elementary civil and democratic rights, freedom of speech and freedom of assembly. Despite being “onside” with the “war on Covid”, many of them agree that vaccines should not be forced. Even those within the anti-lockdown movement who can see through the false Covid narrative like a pane of glass, are also appalled at the removal of even the basic principle of consent.

Even though liberal democracy has always been a shroud for the dictatorship of capital, the bourgeois class was materially able to allow liberal democratic rights while certain economic conditions were maintained. Free speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of movement – these and other rights were tolerated only insofar as the productive forces of capitalism were expanding, only so long as finance capital was able to expand internationally, and only to the extent that new markets were being found. This is no longer the case, so the Western ruling classes have little need for liberal democracy. Imperialist exploitation of the Third World has continued for decades, but that road is facing obstacles. Imperialist wars of regime change were another way for Western capital to expand, yet now that option is rarely available. Unable to expand at home, unable to plunder abroad, the ruling classes of the West now aim their guns at the heads of “their own” working classes. This is the real source of “Covid”.

Paraphrasing Russian Revolution co-leader L Trotsky, either the proletariat overthrows the Ancien Regime – the utterly decayed bourgeois society – or capitalism, in the interests of self-preservation, replaces liberal democracy with fascism.[12] Lockdown fascism, therefore, is not the result of “panic”, or an “overreaction”, or of snowballing “mistakes”. For some time, capitalism had already been doing away with free markets and free competition and had for the last 30 years been cannibalising the state through privatisation and deregulation. Now, capital needs to go to another level in an effort to regain an adequate rate of return on investment. The cost of labour power – wages and salaries of workers – needs to be depressed as low as possible. Throwing millions out of work while scaring the daylights out of the workers who remain employed, is one way of doing this.

If it was possible to explain in three words why imperialism must remove liberal democracy and install lockdown fascism, it would be: People’s Republic of China (PRC). Economically, the PRC is on the threshold of surpassing the economy of the United States of America (US). The situation is analogous to the 1930s, when the economy of the Soviet Union was achieving record growth while the West was in the deepest economic depression it had then known. Today, breakneck economic growth in the socialistic PRC is simply embarrassing the West. Purchasing Power Parity (PPP), or the amount one can purchase for a given amount of currency, is one indicator of economic performance, and the PRC has in recent years left the US behind.[13] The largest bank in the world – according to assets under management – is the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC).[14] Even though it operates commercially, this bank is in fact state owned and state controlled.

Lockdown tyranny the last roll of the dice

There can be no more accurate metaphor for the PRC’s economy surpassing Western decline than the recent launch of the world’s fastest train in East China’s Shandong Province. A magnetic levitation train developed by China Railway Rolling Stock Corporation (CRRC) has made its debut in Qingdao and is capable of reaching speeds of an astonishing 600 kilometres per hour(klm/hr).[15] This compares with standard high speed rail at 350 klm/hr and passenger aeroplanes which cruise at around 800 klm/hr. CRRC is a wholly state owned company, as is the entire rail network in the PRC. Compare this stunning achievement to Australia or the US, both of which are not in possession of even one kilometre of high speed rail !! The abyss between the Australian and US private capitalist economies and the socialistic collectively owned economy of the PRC is there for all to see.

At the same time, the conservative and bureaucratic political caste leading the PRC is subcontracting itself to imperialism by enforcing its own version of lockdown, facemask and Covid injection insanity against workers on its mainland. Betrayal of workers at home and internationally is second nature to Stalinism, and the entertaining of the false Covid narrative by the Communist Party of China (CPC) is another prime example. Despite this, workers in China and internationally need to defend the enormous gains of the 1949 revolution against imperialist subversion. However deformed and distorted, the loss of the PRC workers’ state would arguably be a greater setback for the world proletariat than the counter-revolution which abolished the USSR in 1991.

In the West, the pressing task is the rebellion against lockdown terror, which now regularly mobilises millions of people determined to fight for freedom. Lockdown fascism is the ruling elite’s last chance to save capitalism, and it comes with enormous risks. Any form of fascism generates acute and continuous conflict, which can result in overthrow if the working classes possess the level of organisation required, or war against states that resist imperialist domination. Yet Covid is first of all a civil war waged by billionaire capital against workers and the oppressed. At the same time, by initiating conflict against its nemesis, the world bourgeoisie demonstrates its political bankruptcy.

The abject treachery of the lockdown fake left alongside Union officials is proof positive that lockdown fascism is being waged under the banner of liberalism, i.e., totally fake claims to progressive, humanitarian, “public health”, and even “anti-racist” and “anti-fascist” values. In that vein, the facemask is the swastika of lockdown fascism. Like Covid “vaccines”, facemasks can be forced onto those who question its rationale, becoming both a symbol and a method of gagging and suffocation simultaneously. They are also the perfect propaganda ploy, giving the appearance of a “health emergency”, when nothing remotely resembling it exists.

By a quirk of history, the anti-lockdown movement is currently leading the struggle for proletarian democracy – despite what many of its protagonists imagine themselves to be fighting. By its very existence, the anti-lockdown movement explodes the bourgeois fiction of Covid. Leninists must find ways to aid and assist this rebellion, while taking the time to “patiently explain” that freedom can only be won through the assembly of a workers’ republic. Indispensable for this is the manufacture of a Marxist vanguard party upholding the theory of Permanent Revolution, which can help lead the toiling masses to their rightful place as masters of their own destiny.

WORKERS  LEAGUE

www.redfireonline.com

E: workersleague@redfireonline.com


[1] https://www.health.act.gov.au/news/covid-19-update-act-enters-seven-day-lockdown-12-august-2021 (12.08.2021)

[2] https://www.australia.com/en/facts-and-planning/weather-in-australia/darwin-weather.html (12.08.2021)

[3] https://au.newschant.com/national/nt/northern-territory-says-lockdowns-and-border-closures-could-be-viable-options-after-vaccine-benchmark-reached/ (12.08.2021)

[4] https://nypressnews.com/news/world/australia/coronavirus-australia-walgett-nsw-to-go-into-lockdown-after-positive-covid-case/ (12.08.2012)

[5] https://quickstats.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2016/quickstat/LGA17900 (12.08.2021)

[6] https://blackflagsydney.com/article/26 (12.08.2021)

[7] https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/other/western-sydney-more-susceptible-to-mental-health-impacts-from-lockdown/ar-AANbcjN (12.08.2021)

[8] https://www.aihw.gov.au/suicide-self-harm-monitoring/data/covid-19 (12.08.2021)

[9] https://www.globalresearch.ca/does-the-virus-exist-the-sars-cov-2-has-not-been-isolated-biggest-fraud-in-medical-history/5752066 (14.08.2021)

[10] https://journal-neo.org/2021/08/11/delta-variants-pcr-tests-and-cognitive-dissonance/ (14.08.2021)

[11] https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/WLD/world/death-rate (14.08.2021)

[12] https://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1936/03/crossroads1.html (15-08-2021)

[13] https://www.globalfirepower.com/purchasing-power-parity.php (15-08-2021)

[14] https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/122315/worlds-top-10-banks-jpm-wfc.asp (15-08-2021)

[15] https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202107/1228998.shtml (16-08-2021)